Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study

© 2018 Mac Keith Press Aim: To describe health-related quality of life of Australian children and adolescents with Down syndrome and compare it with norm-referenced data. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with parents of 75 children and adolescents (43 males, 32 females) with Down syndr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shields, N., Leonard, H., Munteanu, S., Bourke, J., Lim, P., Taylor, N., Downs, Jennepher
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72581
_version_ 1848762788617388032
author Shields, N.
Leonard, H.
Munteanu, S.
Bourke, J.
Lim, P.
Taylor, N.
Downs, Jennepher
author_facet Shields, N.
Leonard, H.
Munteanu, S.
Bourke, J.
Lim, P.
Taylor, N.
Downs, Jennepher
author_sort Shields, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2018 Mac Keith Press Aim: To describe health-related quality of life of Australian children and adolescents with Down syndrome and compare it with norm-referenced data. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with parents of 75 children and adolescents (43 males, 32 females) with Down syndrome aged 5 to 18 years (mean age 13y 2mo, SD 4y 8mo). The proxy-report KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire was administered and five dimensions of health-related quality of life were measured. Data were analysed descriptively and compared with normative data. Results: Total group mean scores for psychological well-being, autonomy and parent relation, and school environment dimensions were within normal threshold values, whereas mean scores for physical well-being, and social support and peers dimensions, were poorer. For participants with Down syndrome aged 8 to 18 years, the difference with normative data for proxy-reported physical well-being, psychological well-being, and social support and peers dimensions favoured typically developing children. Adolescents (13–18y) with Down syndrome scored poorer on all dimensions than children (5–12y) with Down syndrome. Interpretation: Our findings assist a better understanding of the lived experiences of children and adolescents with Down syndrome, as perceived by their parents, and suggest aspects of health that could be influenced to optimize their quality of life. What this paper adds: Proxy-reported psychological well-being and autonomy were within the normal range for children with Down syndrome. Physical well-being and social support scores were significantly lower than normative data. Proxy-reported scores for adolescents with Down syndrome were consistently poorer than for children with Down syndrome and the differences were clinically important.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:53:08Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-72581
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:53:08Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-725812018-12-13T09:34:51Z Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study Shields, N. Leonard, H. Munteanu, S. Bourke, J. Lim, P. Taylor, N. Downs, Jennepher © 2018 Mac Keith Press Aim: To describe health-related quality of life of Australian children and adolescents with Down syndrome and compare it with norm-referenced data. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with parents of 75 children and adolescents (43 males, 32 females) with Down syndrome aged 5 to 18 years (mean age 13y 2mo, SD 4y 8mo). The proxy-report KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire was administered and five dimensions of health-related quality of life were measured. Data were analysed descriptively and compared with normative data. Results: Total group mean scores for psychological well-being, autonomy and parent relation, and school environment dimensions were within normal threshold values, whereas mean scores for physical well-being, and social support and peers dimensions, were poorer. For participants with Down syndrome aged 8 to 18 years, the difference with normative data for proxy-reported physical well-being, psychological well-being, and social support and peers dimensions favoured typically developing children. Adolescents (13–18y) with Down syndrome scored poorer on all dimensions than children (5–12y) with Down syndrome. Interpretation: Our findings assist a better understanding of the lived experiences of children and adolescents with Down syndrome, as perceived by their parents, and suggest aspects of health that could be influenced to optimize their quality of life. What this paper adds: Proxy-reported psychological well-being and autonomy were within the normal range for children with Down syndrome. Physical well-being and social support scores were significantly lower than normative data. Proxy-reported scores for adolescents with Down syndrome were consistently poorer than for children with Down syndrome and the differences were clinically important. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72581 10.1111/dmcn.13670 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Shields, N.
Leonard, H.
Munteanu, S.
Bourke, J.
Lim, P.
Taylor, N.
Downs, Jennepher
Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title_full Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title_short Parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with Down syndrome: a descriptive study
title_sort parent-reported health-related quality of life of children with down syndrome: a descriptive study
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72581