Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade

This article explores whether animal welfare can be deployed as a legitimate restriction on trade under the World Trade Organization framework. Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade are traversed; along with the two relatively recen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cunningham, Robert, Vindedzis, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Adelaide Law Review Association 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72407
_version_ 1848762742375186432
author Cunningham, Robert
Vindedzis, S.
author_facet Cunningham, Robert
Vindedzis, S.
author_sort Cunningham, Robert
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This article explores whether animal welfare can be deployed as a legitimate restriction on trade under the World Trade Organization framework. Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade are traversed; along with the two relatively recent cases of US — Tuna II (DS381) and EC — Seal Products (DS400/401). While the World Trade Organization has traditionally demonstrated a reluctance to legitimise animal welfare based restrictions, contemporary World Trade Organization case law signals the possibility of a shifting landscape. The article argues that further development of coherent principles is required for the benefit of both animal welfare and trade certainty. This is particularly so in relation to the interrelated issues of extraterritoriality and coercion.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:52:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-72407
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:52:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Adelaide Law Review Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-724072019-02-20T06:55:54Z Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade Cunningham, Robert Vindedzis, S. This article explores whether animal welfare can be deployed as a legitimate restriction on trade under the World Trade Organization framework. Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade are traversed; along with the two relatively recent cases of US — Tuna II (DS381) and EC — Seal Products (DS400/401). While the World Trade Organization has traditionally demonstrated a reluctance to legitimise animal welfare based restrictions, contemporary World Trade Organization case law signals the possibility of a shifting landscape. The article argues that further development of coherent principles is required for the benefit of both animal welfare and trade certainty. This is particularly so in relation to the interrelated issues of extraterritoriality and coercion. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72407 Adelaide Law Review Association restricted
spellingShingle Cunningham, Robert
Vindedzis, S.
Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title_full Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title_fullStr Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title_full_unstemmed Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title_short Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad? Animal Welfare vs the World Trade Organisation (Featuring Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Article 2 of the Technical Barriers to Trade
title_sort four legs good, two legs bad? animal welfare vs the world trade organisation (featuring article xx of the general agreement on tariffs and trade and article 2 of the technical barriers to trade
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72407