Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians

This paper provides new insights on the labour market discrimination faced by indigenous Australians - one of the most disadvantaged indigenous populations in developed countries. Combining two large, nationally-representative datasets, we decompose the employment gap between indigenous and non-indi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duncan, Alan, Mavisakalyan, Astghik, Tarverdi, Yashar
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2018
Online Access:http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/raec20/current
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72270
_version_ 1848762705336336384
author Duncan, Alan
Mavisakalyan, Astghik
Tarverdi, Yashar
author_facet Duncan, Alan
Mavisakalyan, Astghik
Tarverdi, Yashar
author_sort Duncan, Alan
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper provides new insights on the labour market discrimination faced by indigenous Australians - one of the most disadvantaged indigenous populations in developed countries. Combining two large, nationally-representative datasets, we decompose the employment gap between indigenous and non-indigenous populations as of 2014-2015, and show that differences in characteristics between the two groups account for only 43% of the employment gap for females, and 23% of the gap for males. We then demonstrate that statistical measures are positively related to discrimination reports of females and negatively related to discrimination reports of males. Our findings underscore the importance of improving transparency in employment processes for addressing the issue of disadvantage of racial minorities.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:51:49Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-72270
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:51:49Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-722702018-12-13T09:12:55Z Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians Duncan, Alan Mavisakalyan, Astghik Tarverdi, Yashar This paper provides new insights on the labour market discrimination faced by indigenous Australians - one of the most disadvantaged indigenous populations in developed countries. Combining two large, nationally-representative datasets, we decompose the employment gap between indigenous and non-indigenous populations as of 2014-2015, and show that differences in characteristics between the two groups account for only 43% of the employment gap for females, and 23% of the gap for males. We then demonstrate that statistical measures are positively related to discrimination reports of females and negatively related to discrimination reports of males. Our findings underscore the importance of improving transparency in employment processes for addressing the issue of disadvantage of racial minorities. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72270 http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/raec20/current Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Duncan, Alan
Mavisakalyan, Astghik
Tarverdi, Yashar
Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title_full Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title_fullStr Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title_full_unstemmed Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title_short Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians
title_sort self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: the case of indigenous australians
url http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/raec20/current
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/72270