Triggering Mechanisms for Motor Actions: The Effects of Expectation on Reaction Times to Intense Acoustic Stimuli

QR Code

Triggering Mechanisms for Motor Actions: The Effects of Expectation on Reaction Times to Intense Acoustic Stimuli

Motor actions can be released much sooner than normal when the go-signal is of very high intensity (>100 dBa). Although statistical evidence from individual studies has been mixed, it has been assumed that sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle activity could be used to distinguish between two neur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Leow, L., Uchida, A., Egberts, J., Riek, S., Lipp, Ottmar, Tresilian, J., Marinovic, Welber
Format:	Journal Article
Published:	Pergamon 2018
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71908

Similar Items

Triggering mechanisms for motor actions: A mini meta-analysis and experimental data
by: Leow, L., et al.
Published: (2018)

Neural gain induced by startling acoustic stimuli is additive to preparatory activation
by: McInnes, Aaron, et al.
Published: (2020)

The facilitation of motor actions by acoustic and electric stimulation
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2015)

Responses to loud auditory stimuli indicate that movement-related activation builds up in anticipation of action
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2013)

Cumulative distribution functions: An alternative approach to examine the triggering of prepared motor actions in the StartReact effect
by: McInnes, Aaron Nicholas, et al.
Published: (2021)

Preparatory suppression and facilitation of voluntary and involuntary responses to loud acoustic stimuli in an anticipatory timing task
by: Nguyen, An, et al.
Published: (2021)

Engagement of the contralateral limb can enhance the facilitation of motor output by loud acoustic stimuli
by: McInnes, Aaron Nicholas, et al.
Published: (2022)

Triggering prepared actions by sudden sounds: Reassessing the evidence for a single mechanism
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2016)

Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2017)

The effect of attention on the release of anticipatory timing actions
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2014)

Increased corticospinal excitability induced by unpleasant visual stimuli
by: Coelho, C., et al.
Published: (2010)

The early release of actions by loud sounds in muscles with distinct connectivity
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2014)

Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2014)

Premovement inhibition can protect motor actions from interference by response irrelevant sensory stimulation.
by: McInnes, Aaron Nicholas, et al.
Published: (2021)

Corticospinal excitability during preparation for an anticipatory action is modulated by the availability of visual information
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2011)

The interplay of perceptual processing demands and practice in modulating voluntary and involuntary motor responses
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evolving changes in cortical and subcortical excitability during movement preparation: A study of brain potentials and eye-blink reflexes during loud acoustic stimulation
by: Nguyen, An, et al.
Published: (2023)

The effects of preparation and acoustic stimulation on contralateral and ipsilateral corticospinal excitability
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2015)

Visual attention affects temporal estimation in anticipatory motor actions
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2011)

Savings for visuomotor adaptation require prior history of error, not prior repetition of successful actions
by: Leow, L., et al.
Published: (2016)

Motor output matters: Evidence of a continuous relationship between Stop/No-go P300 amplitude and peak force on failed inhibitions at the trial-level
by: Nguyen, An T., et al.
Published: (2020)

How disappointing: Startle modulation reveals conditional stimuli presented after pleasant unconditional stimuli acquire negative valence
by: Green, Luke J.S., et al.
Published: (2020)

N1-P2 event-related potentials and perceived intensity are associated: The effects of a weak pre-stimulus and attentional load on processing of a subsequent intense stimulus
by: Favero, J.D., et al.
Published: (2023)

Electric and acoustic stimulation during movement preparation can facilitate movement execution in healthy participants and stroke survivors
by: Marinovic, Welber, et al.
Published: (2016)

Visual search for animal fear-relevant stimuli in children
by: Waters, A., et al.
Published: (2008)

Multiple fear-related stimuli enhance physiological arousal during extinction and reduce physiological arousal to novel stimuli and the threat conditioned stimulus
by: Waters, A., et al.
Published: (2018)

Cerebellar anodal tDCS increases implicit learning when strategic re-aiming is suppressed in sensorimotor adaptation
by: Leow, L., et al.
Published: (2017)

The influence of animal fear on attentional capture by fear-relevant animal stimuli in children
by: Waters, A., et al.
Published: (2008)

Faster acquisition of conditioned fear to fear-relevant than to nonfear-relevant conditional stimuli
by: Ho, Y., et al.
Published: (2014)

Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention
by: Forbes, S., et al.
Published: (2011)

Focus of attention changes intracortical excitability in the primary motor cortex.
by: Marinovic, Welber
Published: (2016)

EXTINCTION DURING RECONSOLIDATION ELIMINATES RECOVERY OF FEAR CONDITIONED TO FEAR-IRRELEVANT AND FEAR-RELEVANT STIMULI
by: Thompson, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Extinction during reconsolidation eliminates recovery of fear conditioned to fear-irrelevant and fear-relevant stimuli
by: Thompson, A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Selective attention for masked and unmasked emotionally toned stimuli: Effects of trait anxiety, state anxiety, and test order
by: Edwards, M., et al.
Published: (2010)

Visual search with animal fear-relevant stimuli: A tale of two procedures
by: Waters, A., et al.
Published: (2011)

Fear Conditioning to Subliminal Fear Relevant and Non Fear Relevant Stimuli
by: Lipp, Ottmar, et al.
Published: (2014)

Reply to Maslovat et al
by: Marinovic, W., et al.
Published: (2015)

Are snakes and spiders special? Acquisition of negative valence and modified attentional processing by non-fear-relevant animal stimuli
by: Purkis, H., et al.
Published: (2009)

Pupil dilation during encoding, but not type of auditory stimulation, predicts recognition success in face memory
by: Cronin, Sophie L., et al.
Published: (2023)

An increase in stimulus arousal has differential effects on the processing speed of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli
by: Purkis, H., et al.
Published: (2009)