Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries
Front-of-Package labels (FoPLs) are efficient tools for increasing consumers’ awareness of foods’ nutritional quality and encouraging healthier choices. A label’s design is likely to influence its effectiveness; however, few studies have compared the ability of different FoPLs to facilitate a consum...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
MDPI Publishing
2018
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71745 |
| _version_ | 1848762561698201600 |
|---|---|
| author | Egnell, M. Talati, Zenobia Hercberg, S. Pettigrew, Simone Julia, C. |
| author_facet | Egnell, M. Talati, Zenobia Hercberg, S. Pettigrew, Simone Julia, C. |
| author_sort | Egnell, M. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Front-of-Package labels (FoPLs) are efficient tools for increasing consumers’ awareness of foods’ nutritional quality and encouraging healthier choices. A label’s design is likely to influence its effectiveness; however, few studies have compared the ability of different FoPLs to facilitate a consumer understanding of foods’ nutritional quality, especially across sociocultural contexts. This study aimed to assess consumers’ ability to understand five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), and Warning symbol] in 12 different countries. In 2018, approximately 1000 participants per country were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products (one set of three pizzas, one set of three cakes, and one set of three breakfast cereals) according to their nutritional quality, via an online survey. Participants were subsequently randomised to one of five FoPL conditions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Changes in a participants’ ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks were assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. In all 12 countries and for all three food categories, the Nutri-Score performed best, followed by the MTL, HSR, Warning symbol, and RIs. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:49:32Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-71745 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:49:32Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | MDPI Publishing |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-717452019-01-15T04:42:19Z Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries Egnell, M. Talati, Zenobia Hercberg, S. Pettigrew, Simone Julia, C. Front-of-Package labels (FoPLs) are efficient tools for increasing consumers’ awareness of foods’ nutritional quality and encouraging healthier choices. A label’s design is likely to influence its effectiveness; however, few studies have compared the ability of different FoPLs to facilitate a consumer understanding of foods’ nutritional quality, especially across sociocultural contexts. This study aimed to assess consumers’ ability to understand five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), and Warning symbol] in 12 different countries. In 2018, approximately 1000 participants per country were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products (one set of three pizzas, one set of three cakes, and one set of three breakfast cereals) according to their nutritional quality, via an online survey. Participants were subsequently randomised to one of five FoPL conditions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Changes in a participants’ ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks were assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. In all 12 countries and for all three food categories, the Nutri-Score performed best, followed by the MTL, HSR, Warning symbol, and RIs. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71745 10.3390/nu10101542 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ MDPI Publishing fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Egnell, M. Talati, Zenobia Hercberg, S. Pettigrew, Simone Julia, C. Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title | Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title_full | Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title_fullStr | Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title_short | Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| title_sort | objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: an international comparative experimental study across 12 countries |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71745 |