Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the literature on team resilience to gain insight into current thinking regarding its definition and conceptualisation, and to identify how researchers have operationalised and measu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis Ltd
2018
|
| Online Access: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL160100033 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71698 |
| _version_ | 1848762548641333248 |
|---|---|
| author | Chapman, M. Lines, R. Crane, M. Ducker, Kagan Ntoumanis, Nikos Peeling, P. Parker, Sharon Quested, Eleanor Temby, P. Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie Gucciardi, Daniel |
| author_facet | Chapman, M. Lines, R. Crane, M. Ducker, Kagan Ntoumanis, Nikos Peeling, P. Parker, Sharon Quested, Eleanor Temby, P. Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie Gucciardi, Daniel |
| author_sort | Chapman, M. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the literature on team resilience to gain insight into current thinking regarding its definition and conceptualisation, and to identify how researchers have operationalised and measured this concept. We conducted a systematic scoping review using the 5-phase approach proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. A total of seven databases were searched, followed by a citation search of eligible papers via Google Scholar. Of the 275 articles identified via the search process, 27 papers were deemed eligible for review. Several key findings regarding the literature on team resilience were observed: (i) definitions varied in terms of content (e.g. input or process), breadth (e.g. unidimensional versus multidimensional), and quality (e.g. essential and necessary attributes of key components); (ii) there was a predominance of single-level conceptualisations of team resilience; and (iii) there has been a reliance on cross-sectional research designs in empirical studies, which is incongruent with the dynamic nature of this concept. Key recommendations from this scoping review focus on definitional, theoretical, and methodological issues. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:49:19Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-71698 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:49:19Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-716982023-06-26T01:29:21Z Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work Chapman, M. Lines, R. Crane, M. Ducker, Kagan Ntoumanis, Nikos Peeling, P. Parker, Sharon Quested, Eleanor Temby, P. Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie Gucciardi, Daniel © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the literature on team resilience to gain insight into current thinking regarding its definition and conceptualisation, and to identify how researchers have operationalised and measured this concept. We conducted a systematic scoping review using the 5-phase approach proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. A total of seven databases were searched, followed by a citation search of eligible papers via Google Scholar. Of the 275 articles identified via the search process, 27 papers were deemed eligible for review. Several key findings regarding the literature on team resilience were observed: (i) definitions varied in terms of content (e.g. input or process), breadth (e.g. unidimensional versus multidimensional), and quality (e.g. essential and necessary attributes of key components); (ii) there was a predominance of single-level conceptualisations of team resilience; and (iii) there has been a reliance on cross-sectional research designs in empirical studies, which is incongruent with the dynamic nature of this concept. Key recommendations from this scoping review focus on definitional, theoretical, and methodological issues. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71698 10.1080/02678373.2018.1529064 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL160100033 Taylor and Francis Ltd fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Chapman, M. Lines, R. Crane, M. Ducker, Kagan Ntoumanis, Nikos Peeling, P. Parker, Sharon Quested, Eleanor Temby, P. Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie Gucciardi, Daniel Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title | Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title_full | Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title_fullStr | Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title_full_unstemmed | Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title_short | Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| title_sort | team resilience: a scoping review of conceptual and empirical work |
| url | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL160100033 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71698 |