The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Van Bockstaele, B., Notebaert, L., MacLeod, C., Salemink, E., Clarke, Patrick, Verschuere, B., Bögels, S., Wiers, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV; North Holland 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71694
_version_ 1848762547510968320
author Van Bockstaele, B.
Notebaert, L.
MacLeod, C.
Salemink, E.
Clarke, Patrick
Verschuere, B.
Bögels, S.
Wiers, R.
author_facet Van Bockstaele, B.
Notebaert, L.
MacLeod, C.
Salemink, E.
Clarke, Patrick
Verschuere, B.
Bögels, S.
Wiers, R.
author_sort Van Bockstaele, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:49:18Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-71694
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:49:18Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier BV; North Holland
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-716942018-12-13T09:33:49Z The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation Van Bockstaele, B. Notebaert, L. MacLeod, C. Salemink, E. Clarke, Patrick Verschuere, B. Bögels, S. Wiers, R. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71694 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010 Elsevier BV; North Holland restricted
spellingShingle Van Bockstaele, B.
Notebaert, L.
MacLeod, C.
Salemink, E.
Clarke, Patrick
Verschuere, B.
Bögels, S.
Wiers, R.
The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title_full The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title_fullStr The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title_full_unstemmed The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title_short The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
title_sort effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/71694