Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework
A framework for organizing the semantic structure of aesthetic experience is proposed. The new framework is presented in an 'affect-space' and consists of three sets of dichotomous classifications: (1) internal locus (the felt experience) versus external locus (the description of the obje...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Ohio State University * School of Music
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70787 |
| _version_ | 1848762301847437312 |
|---|---|
| author | Schubert, E. North, Adrian Hargreaves, D. |
| author_facet | Schubert, E. North, Adrian Hargreaves, D. |
| author_sort | Schubert, E. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | A framework for organizing the semantic structure of aesthetic experience is proposed. The new framework is presented in an 'affect-space' and consists of three sets of dichotomous classifications: (1) internal locus (the felt experience) versus external locus (the description of the object), (2) 'affect-valence' — the attraction to (positive valence, e.g. preference, awe) or repulsion from (negative valence, e.g. hatred, disgust) the artwork/object — versus 'emotion-valence' — the character/contemplation of an emotion (happiness-an example of positive valence, sadness-an example of negative valence), and (3) deep versus shallow hedonic tone—e.g. 'awe' is deep, 'preference' is shallow. Deep hedonic tone is proposed as a better index of aesthetic experience (awe, being moved etc.) than shallow hedonic tone (preference, pleasure, enjoyment). Deep, internal locus, affect-valence during the contemplation of an object amenable to an aesthetic judgement (beautiful, ugly etc.) presents the necessary and sufficient conditions for an aesthetic experience. The framework allows future researchers to consider which aspects of an experience come closest to actual aesthetic experience from an empirical aesthetics perspective. It also highlights the limited value in grouping together so many aesthetic experiences under the rubric of emotion, such as aesthetic emotions, preference, basic emotions and so forth. Our framework paves the way for testing and further development of theory on aesthetic experience. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:45:24Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-70787 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:45:24Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Ohio State University * School of Music |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-707872019-07-10T01:46:33Z Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework Schubert, E. North, Adrian Hargreaves, D. A framework for organizing the semantic structure of aesthetic experience is proposed. The new framework is presented in an 'affect-space' and consists of three sets of dichotomous classifications: (1) internal locus (the felt experience) versus external locus (the description of the object), (2) 'affect-valence' — the attraction to (positive valence, e.g. preference, awe) or repulsion from (negative valence, e.g. hatred, disgust) the artwork/object — versus 'emotion-valence' — the character/contemplation of an emotion (happiness-an example of positive valence, sadness-an example of negative valence), and (3) deep versus shallow hedonic tone—e.g. 'awe' is deep, 'preference' is shallow. Deep hedonic tone is proposed as a better index of aesthetic experience (awe, being moved etc.) than shallow hedonic tone (preference, pleasure, enjoyment). Deep, internal locus, affect-valence during the contemplation of an object amenable to an aesthetic judgement (beautiful, ugly etc.) presents the necessary and sufficient conditions for an aesthetic experience. The framework allows future researchers to consider which aspects of an experience come closest to actual aesthetic experience from an empirical aesthetics perspective. It also highlights the limited value in grouping together so many aesthetic experiences under the rubric of emotion, such as aesthetic emotions, preference, basic emotions and so forth. Our framework paves the way for testing and further development of theory on aesthetic experience. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70787 10.18061/emr.v11i3-4.5115 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Ohio State University * School of Music fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Schubert, E. North, Adrian Hargreaves, D. Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title | Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title_full | Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title_fullStr | Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title_short | Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework |
| title_sort | aesthetic experience explained by the affect-space framework |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70787 |