Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data

New insights into the understanding of calcite-water interface structure are obtained through direct comparisons of multiple classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with high-resolution specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) data. This set of comparisons, with four different state of-the-art force f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fenter, P., Kerisit, S., Raiteri, Paolo, Gale, Julian
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Chemical Society 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7055
_version_ 1848745256247361536
author Fenter, P.
Kerisit, S.
Raiteri, Paolo
Gale, Julian
author_facet Fenter, P.
Kerisit, S.
Raiteri, Paolo
Gale, Julian
author_sort Fenter, P.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description New insights into the understanding of calcite-water interface structure are obtained through direct comparisons of multiple classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with high-resolution specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) data. This set of comparisons, with four different state of-the-art force fields (including two non-polarizable, one polarizable, and one reactive force field), reveal new insights into the absolute accuracy of the simulated structures and the uniqueness of the XR-derived structural results. These four simulations, though qualitatively similar, have visibly distinct interfacial structures and are distinguished through a quantitative comparison of the XR signals calculated from these simulations with experimental XR data. The results demonstrate that the simulated calcite-water interface structures, taken as a whole, are not consistent with the XR data (i.e., within the precision and accuracy of the XR data). This disagreement is largely due to the simulated calcite interfacial structure. The simulated interfacial water profiles show a higher level of consistency with the XR data, but with substantially different levels of agreement, with the rigid-ion model (RIM) simulations showing semi-quantitative agreement. Further comparisons of the structural parameters that describe the interfacial structure (derived from both the MD simulations and the XR data) provide further insight into the sources of differences between these two approaches. Using the new insights from the RIM simulations, new structures of the calcite-water interface consistent with both the experimental data and the simulation are identified and compared to recent results.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:14:28Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-7055
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:14:28Z
publishDate 2012
publisher American Chemical Society
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-70552017-09-13T16:09:21Z Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data Fenter, P. Kerisit, S. Raiteri, Paolo Gale, Julian New insights into the understanding of calcite-water interface structure are obtained through direct comparisons of multiple classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with high-resolution specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) data. This set of comparisons, with four different state of-the-art force fields (including two non-polarizable, one polarizable, and one reactive force field), reveal new insights into the absolute accuracy of the simulated structures and the uniqueness of the XR-derived structural results. These four simulations, though qualitatively similar, have visibly distinct interfacial structures and are distinguished through a quantitative comparison of the XR signals calculated from these simulations with experimental XR data. The results demonstrate that the simulated calcite-water interface structures, taken as a whole, are not consistent with the XR data (i.e., within the precision and accuracy of the XR data). This disagreement is largely due to the simulated calcite interfacial structure. The simulated interfacial water profiles show a higher level of consistency with the XR data, but with substantially different levels of agreement, with the rigid-ion model (RIM) simulations showing semi-quantitative agreement. Further comparisons of the structural parameters that describe the interfacial structure (derived from both the MD simulations and the XR data) provide further insight into the sources of differences between these two approaches. Using the new insights from the RIM simulations, new structures of the calcite-water interface consistent with both the experimental data and the simulation are identified and compared to recent results. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7055 10.1021/jp310943s American Chemical Society restricted
spellingShingle Fenter, P.
Kerisit, S.
Raiteri, Paolo
Gale, Julian
Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title_full Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title_fullStr Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title_full_unstemmed Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title_short Is the calcite–water interface understood?: Direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
title_sort is the calcite–water interface understood?: direct comparisons of molecular dynamics simulations with specular x-ray reflectivity data
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/7055