Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact

This study experimentally investigates the impact response of rubberized concrete columns subjected to lateral impact. A pendulum impact testing apparatus was used to test the concrete columns with varied rubber contents including 0%, 15%, and 30%. Fine and coarse aggregates were replaced by crumb r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pham, Thong, Zhang, Xihong, Elchalakani, M., Karrech, A., Hao, Hong, Ryan, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70191
_version_ 1848762239434096640
author Pham, Thong
Zhang, Xihong
Elchalakani, M.
Karrech, A.
Hao, Hong
Ryan, A.
author_facet Pham, Thong
Zhang, Xihong
Elchalakani, M.
Karrech, A.
Hao, Hong
Ryan, A.
author_sort Pham, Thong
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study experimentally investigates the impact response of rubberized concrete columns subjected to lateral impact. A pendulum impact testing apparatus was used to test the concrete columns with varied rubber contents including 0%, 15%, and 30%. Fine and coarse aggregates were replaced by crumb rubber with particle sizes of 2–5 mm and 5–7 mm, respectively. The experimental results have shown that the rubberized concrete columns significantly reduce the peak impact force (27%–40%) and thus mitigate the risk of injury and even death if rubberized concrete is used in roadside barriers. In addition, the rubberized concrete columns were more flexible than the normal concrete columns. They could deflect twice the reference columns before failure. Rubberized concrete significantly increased the impact energy absorption. The columns with 15% and 30% crumb rubber showed an increase in the impact energy absorption by 58% and 63% as compared to the reference columns. The rubberized concrete column confined with FRP outperformed the reference columns in terms of both the energy absorption and load carrying capacity. Therefore, rubberized concrete is a better alternative and recommended for the use in roadside barriers to achieve better impact energy absorption capacity and reduce the maximum impact force under vehicle collisions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:44:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-70191
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:44:24Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-701912020-09-18T05:02:38Z Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact Pham, Thong Zhang, Xihong Elchalakani, M. Karrech, A. Hao, Hong Ryan, A. This study experimentally investigates the impact response of rubberized concrete columns subjected to lateral impact. A pendulum impact testing apparatus was used to test the concrete columns with varied rubber contents including 0%, 15%, and 30%. Fine and coarse aggregates were replaced by crumb rubber with particle sizes of 2–5 mm and 5–7 mm, respectively. The experimental results have shown that the rubberized concrete columns significantly reduce the peak impact force (27%–40%) and thus mitigate the risk of injury and even death if rubberized concrete is used in roadside barriers. In addition, the rubberized concrete columns were more flexible than the normal concrete columns. They could deflect twice the reference columns before failure. Rubberized concrete significantly increased the impact energy absorption. The columns with 15% and 30% crumb rubber showed an increase in the impact energy absorption by 58% and 63% as compared to the reference columns. The rubberized concrete column confined with FRP outperformed the reference columns in terms of both the energy absorption and load carrying capacity. Therefore, rubberized concrete is a better alternative and recommended for the use in roadside barriers to achieve better impact energy absorption capacity and reduce the maximum impact force under vehicle collisions. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70191 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.146 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Elsevier BV fulltext
spellingShingle Pham, Thong
Zhang, Xihong
Elchalakani, M.
Karrech, A.
Hao, Hong
Ryan, A.
Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title_full Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title_fullStr Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title_short Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact
title_sort dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without frp confinement subjected to lateral impact
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/70191