A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI Background: The objective of this study was to describe and quantify mental health (MH) admissions experienced by patients with unintentional burns subsequent to their injury. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study that used de-identified linked hospital,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duke, J., Randall, Sean, Boyd, James, Wood, F., Fear, M., Rea, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Pergamon Press 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69289
_version_ 1848762018191900672
author Duke, J.
Randall, Sean
Boyd, James
Wood, F.
Fear, M.
Rea, S.
author_facet Duke, J.
Randall, Sean
Boyd, James
Wood, F.
Fear, M.
Rea, S.
author_sort Duke, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI Background: The objective of this study was to describe and quantify mental health (MH) admissions experienced by patients with unintentional burns subsequent to their injury. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study that used de-identified linked hospital, death and mental health in-patient case registry data of all burn patients hospitalised for unintentional burns (n = 10,460) between 2000 and 2012 in Western Australia and an age and gender matched uninjured comparison cohort (n = 42,856). Cohorts had a median age at study index of 26 years with males comprising 66% of each cohort. MH admissions for 5 years before and after the injury were examined. Negative binomial and Cox proportional hazards regressions were adjusted for socio-demographic and pre-existing health conditions and used to quantify associations between burns and MH hospitalisations. Results: In the burn cohort during the 5-year post-burn period, 4% had a MH admission, 2% were admitted for self-harm, and 3% were admitted for a behavioural disorder caused by drugs/alcohol. Significantly elevated adjusted admission rates for MH conditions were observed for the burn cohort compared with the uninjured cohort (IRR, 95% CI: 4.89, 3.52–6.79). Increased MH admission rates were found for all age groups but were most pronounced in those younger than 18 years of age at time of burn (IRR, 95% CI: 6.28, 3.00–13.14), followed by those aged 18–60 (5.14, 3.59–7.35) and those over 60 years (IRR, 95% CI: 2.97, 1.38–6.39) compared to the uninjured cohort. Gender-specific analyses showed significant differences for male (IRR, 95% CI: 4.48, 3.05–6.59) and female burn patients (IRR, 95% CI: 6.00, 3.62–9.92), compared to uninjured. The burn cohort had higher adjusted first time admissions for MH conditions (HR, 95% CI: 3.55, 2.72–4.64), mood and anxiety disorders (HR, 95% CI: 3.77, 2.81–5.08), psychotic disorders (HR, 95% CI: 3.55, 1.99–6.15) and behavioural disorders related to alcohol/drugs (HR, 95% CI: 4.75, 3.09–7.28) for five years after the initial burn. Conclusions: Patients hospitalised for unintentional burns had significantly higher MH admission rates after discharge than that observed for an uninjured cohort. Ongoing mental health support is clearly indicated for many burns patients for a prolonged period after discharge.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:40:53Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-69289
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:40:53Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Pergamon Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-692892018-06-29T12:35:59Z A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people Duke, J. Randall, Sean Boyd, James Wood, F. Fear, M. Rea, S. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI Background: The objective of this study was to describe and quantify mental health (MH) admissions experienced by patients with unintentional burns subsequent to their injury. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study that used de-identified linked hospital, death and mental health in-patient case registry data of all burn patients hospitalised for unintentional burns (n = 10,460) between 2000 and 2012 in Western Australia and an age and gender matched uninjured comparison cohort (n = 42,856). Cohorts had a median age at study index of 26 years with males comprising 66% of each cohort. MH admissions for 5 years before and after the injury were examined. Negative binomial and Cox proportional hazards regressions were adjusted for socio-demographic and pre-existing health conditions and used to quantify associations between burns and MH hospitalisations. Results: In the burn cohort during the 5-year post-burn period, 4% had a MH admission, 2% were admitted for self-harm, and 3% were admitted for a behavioural disorder caused by drugs/alcohol. Significantly elevated adjusted admission rates for MH conditions were observed for the burn cohort compared with the uninjured cohort (IRR, 95% CI: 4.89, 3.52–6.79). Increased MH admission rates were found for all age groups but were most pronounced in those younger than 18 years of age at time of burn (IRR, 95% CI: 6.28, 3.00–13.14), followed by those aged 18–60 (5.14, 3.59–7.35) and those over 60 years (IRR, 95% CI: 2.97, 1.38–6.39) compared to the uninjured cohort. Gender-specific analyses showed significant differences for male (IRR, 95% CI: 4.48, 3.05–6.59) and female burn patients (IRR, 95% CI: 6.00, 3.62–9.92), compared to uninjured. The burn cohort had higher adjusted first time admissions for MH conditions (HR, 95% CI: 3.55, 2.72–4.64), mood and anxiety disorders (HR, 95% CI: 3.77, 2.81–5.08), psychotic disorders (HR, 95% CI: 3.55, 1.99–6.15) and behavioural disorders related to alcohol/drugs (HR, 95% CI: 4.75, 3.09–7.28) for five years after the initial burn. Conclusions: Patients hospitalised for unintentional burns had significantly higher MH admission rates after discharge than that observed for an uninjured cohort. Ongoing mental health support is clearly indicated for many burns patients for a prolonged period after discharge. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69289 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.007 Pergamon Press restricted
spellingShingle Duke, J.
Randall, Sean
Boyd, James
Wood, F.
Fear, M.
Rea, S.
A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title_full A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title_fullStr A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title_full_unstemmed A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title_short A population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
title_sort population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the mental health of patients after a non-intentional burn compared with uninjured people
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/69289