How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study

Objectives. To explore how Western Australian mental health clinicians want to evaluate their care. Methods. Using a participatory action research framework, 10 senior psychiatrists and 11 clinical nurse specialists working in an inpatient mental health setting participated in individual interviews,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davison, Sophie, Hauck, Yvonne, Martyr, Philippa, Rock, Daniel
Format: Journal Article
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6864
_version_ 1848745200264937472
author Davison, Sophie
Hauck, Yvonne
Martyr, Philippa
Rock, Daniel
author_facet Davison, Sophie
Hauck, Yvonne
Martyr, Philippa
Rock, Daniel
author_sort Davison, Sophie
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objectives. To explore how Western Australian mental health clinicians want to evaluate their care. Methods. Using a participatory action research framework, 10 senior psychiatrists and 11 clinical nurse specialists working in an inpatient mental health setting participated in individual interviews, focus groups and meetings. All interviews were de-identified during transcription and transcripts and field notes were analysed for common themes. Results. Participants identified what they wanted to measure, how they wanted to measure it and how these changes could be implemented. Clinicians stressed the importance of measuring context (physical, clinical and service) and process as well as outcome, and of evaluating care at an individual and service level with consumer involvement.What is known about the topic? Completion rates of mandatory national outcome measures in mental health in Australia are variable and clinicians have mixed views as to their value. Several barriers have been identified as to their use including clinical, resource and ownership issues. What does this paper add? Some studies have identified areas of good practice and elicited practical suggestions for improvement but few have asked clinicians how they actually want to evaluate the care they provide. This study explored how mental health clinicians wanted to evaluate their care, using a participatory action research framework that encouraged participants to pinpoint problems and issues, account for their social context and develop actions to address them. What are the implications for practitioners? Clinicians were enthusiastic for high quality care and evaluation, but pessimistic about their ability to introduce sustainable change. Establishing and supporting active and responsible leadership at service level may solve this, as may encouraging local standard setting and benchmarking in collaboration with consumers and carers.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:13:35Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-6864
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:13:35Z
publishDate 2013
publisher CSIRO Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-68642017-09-13T14:33:46Z How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study Davison, Sophie Hauck, Yvonne Martyr, Philippa Rock, Daniel care-planning quality outcome Objectives. To explore how Western Australian mental health clinicians want to evaluate their care. Methods. Using a participatory action research framework, 10 senior psychiatrists and 11 clinical nurse specialists working in an inpatient mental health setting participated in individual interviews, focus groups and meetings. All interviews were de-identified during transcription and transcripts and field notes were analysed for common themes. Results. Participants identified what they wanted to measure, how they wanted to measure it and how these changes could be implemented. Clinicians stressed the importance of measuring context (physical, clinical and service) and process as well as outcome, and of evaluating care at an individual and service level with consumer involvement.What is known about the topic? Completion rates of mandatory national outcome measures in mental health in Australia are variable and clinicians have mixed views as to their value. Several barriers have been identified as to their use including clinical, resource and ownership issues. What does this paper add? Some studies have identified areas of good practice and elicited practical suggestions for improvement but few have asked clinicians how they actually want to evaluate the care they provide. This study explored how mental health clinicians wanted to evaluate their care, using a participatory action research framework that encouraged participants to pinpoint problems and issues, account for their social context and develop actions to address them. What are the implications for practitioners? Clinicians were enthusiastic for high quality care and evaluation, but pessimistic about their ability to introduce sustainable change. Establishing and supporting active and responsible leadership at service level may solve this, as may encouraging local standard setting and benchmarking in collaboration with consumers and carers. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6864 10.1071/AH12171 CSIRO Publishing restricted
spellingShingle care-planning
quality
outcome
Davison, Sophie
Hauck, Yvonne
Martyr, Philippa
Rock, Daniel
How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title_full How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title_fullStr How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title_full_unstemmed How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title_short How mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a Western Australian study
title_sort how mental health clinicians want to evaluate the care they give: a western australian study
topic care-planning
quality
outcome
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6864