| _version_ |
1848761768113864704
|
| author |
Levine, Pnina
|
| author_facet |
Levine, Pnina
|
| author_sort |
Levine, Pnina
|
| building |
Curtin Institutional Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| first_indexed |
2025-11-14T10:36:55Z
|
| format |
Journal Article
|
| id |
curtin-20.500.11937-68193
|
| institution |
Curtin University Malaysia
|
| institution_category |
Local University
|
| last_indexed |
2025-11-14T10:36:55Z
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| publisher |
lexis nexis
|
| recordtype |
eprints
|
| repository_type |
Digital Repository
|
| spelling |
curtin-20.500.11937-681932018-12-14T00:56:53Z Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners? Levine, Pnina 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68193 lexis nexis restricted
|
| spellingShingle |
Levine, Pnina
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title |
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title_full |
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title_fullStr |
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title_short |
Retirement Care Australia (Hollywood) Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| title_sort |
retirement care australia (hollywood) pty ltd v commissioner for consumer protection - a windfall for residents or a disincentive to owners?
|
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/68193
|