Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey

© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. A decline in response rates in traditional household surveys, combined with increased internet coverage and decreased research budgets, has resulted in increased attractiveness of web survey research designs based on purposive and voluntary opt-in sampling strategies....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barratt, Monica, Ferris, J., Zahnow, R., Palamar, J., Maier, L., Winstock, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66817
_version_ 1848761400622579712
author Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Zahnow, R.
Palamar, J.
Maier, L.
Winstock, A.
author_facet Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Zahnow, R.
Palamar, J.
Maier, L.
Winstock, A.
author_sort Barratt, Monica
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. A decline in response rates in traditional household surveys, combined with increased internet coverage and decreased research budgets, has resulted in increased attractiveness of web survey research designs based on purposive and voluntary opt-in sampling strategies. In the study of hidden or stigmatised behaviours, such as cannabis use, web survey methods are increasingly common. However, opt-in web surveys are often heavily criticised due to their lack of sampling frame and unknown representativeness. In this article, we outline the current state of the debate about the relevance of pursuing representativeness, the state of probability sampling methods, and the utility of non-probability, web survey methods especially for accessing hidden or minority populations. Our article has two aims: (1) to present a comprehensive description of the methodology we use at Global Drug Survey (GDS), an annual cross-sectional web survey and (2) to compare the age and sex distributions of cannabis users who voluntarily completed (a) a household survey or (b) a large web-based purposive survey (GDS), across three countries: Australia, the United States, and Switzerland. We find that within each set of country comparisons, the demographic distributions among recent cannabis users are broadly similar, demonstrating that the age and sex distributions of those who volunteer to be surveyed are not vastly different between these non-probability and probability methods. We conclude that opt-in web surveys of hard-to-reach populations are an efficient way of gaining in-depth understanding of stigmatised behaviours and are appropriate, as long as they are not used to estimate drug use prevalence of the general population.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:31:04Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-66817
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:31:04Z
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-668172018-05-18T08:07:10Z Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey Barratt, Monica Ferris, J. Zahnow, R. Palamar, J. Maier, L. Winstock, A. © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. A decline in response rates in traditional household surveys, combined with increased internet coverage and decreased research budgets, has resulted in increased attractiveness of web survey research designs based on purposive and voluntary opt-in sampling strategies. In the study of hidden or stigmatised behaviours, such as cannabis use, web survey methods are increasingly common. However, opt-in web surveys are often heavily criticised due to their lack of sampling frame and unknown representativeness. In this article, we outline the current state of the debate about the relevance of pursuing representativeness, the state of probability sampling methods, and the utility of non-probability, web survey methods especially for accessing hidden or minority populations. Our article has two aims: (1) to present a comprehensive description of the methodology we use at Global Drug Survey (GDS), an annual cross-sectional web survey and (2) to compare the age and sex distributions of cannabis users who voluntarily completed (a) a household survey or (b) a large web-based purposive survey (GDS), across three countries: Australia, the United States, and Switzerland. We find that within each set of country comparisons, the demographic distributions among recent cannabis users are broadly similar, demonstrating that the age and sex distributions of those who volunteer to be surveyed are not vastly different between these non-probability and probability methods. We conclude that opt-in web surveys of hard-to-reach populations are an efficient way of gaining in-depth understanding of stigmatised behaviours and are appropriate, as long as they are not used to estimate drug use prevalence of the general population. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66817 10.1177/1178221817716391 SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD restricted
spellingShingle Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Zahnow, R.
Palamar, J.
Maier, L.
Winstock, A.
Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title_full Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title_fullStr Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title_full_unstemmed Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title_short Moving on From Representativeness: Testing the Utility of the Global Drug Survey
title_sort moving on from representativeness: testing the utility of the global drug survey
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66817