Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna

The Georgetown Inlier of northeast Australia provides evidence of critical links between Australia and Laurentia during the late Paleoproterozoic and the early Mesoproterozoic. Detrital zircon age spectra from sedimentary strata within the inlier show two distinct changes in sedimentary provenance:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nordsvan, A., Collins, W., Li, Z., Spencer, Christopher, Pourteau, Amaury, Withnall, I., Betts, P., Volante, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Geological Society of America 2018
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL150100133
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66630
_version_ 1848761356709265408
author Nordsvan, A.
Collins, W.
Li, Z.
Spencer, Christopher
Pourteau, Amaury
Withnall, I.
Betts, P.
Volante, S.
author_facet Nordsvan, A.
Collins, W.
Li, Z.
Spencer, Christopher
Pourteau, Amaury
Withnall, I.
Betts, P.
Volante, S.
author_sort Nordsvan, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The Georgetown Inlier of northeast Australia provides evidence of critical links between Australia and Laurentia during the late Paleoproterozoic and the early Mesoproterozoic. Detrital zircon age spectra from sedimentary strata within the inlier show two distinct changes in sedimentary provenance: (1) the lowermost units (depositional age ca. 1700–1650 Ma) have detrital zircon age spectra that strongly resemble Laurentian magmatic ages and detrital zircon age spectra of the similar-aged Wernecke Supergroup of northwest Laurentia; (2) sediments deposited from ca. 1650 to 1610 Ma show a unimodal proximal signature; and (3) postorogenic sediments deposited after 1550 Ma have detrital zircon age spectra like the Mount Isa Inlier of the North Australia craton. Along with new paleocurrent measurements, the detrital age data challenge current models that suggest that the Georgetown Inlier was part of Australia before ca. 1700 Ma. Rather, we argue it was a continental ribbon rifted from west Laurentia during slab rollback ca. 1680 Ma; by 1650 Ma, the Georgetown Inlier had completely separated from Laurentia, and ca. 1600 Ma collided with Australia during supercontinent Nuna amalgamation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:30:22Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-66630
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:30:22Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Geological Society of America
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-666302022-10-27T07:45:05Z Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna Nordsvan, A. Collins, W. Li, Z. Spencer, Christopher Pourteau, Amaury Withnall, I. Betts, P. Volante, S. The Georgetown Inlier of northeast Australia provides evidence of critical links between Australia and Laurentia during the late Paleoproterozoic and the early Mesoproterozoic. Detrital zircon age spectra from sedimentary strata within the inlier show two distinct changes in sedimentary provenance: (1) the lowermost units (depositional age ca. 1700–1650 Ma) have detrital zircon age spectra that strongly resemble Laurentian magmatic ages and detrital zircon age spectra of the similar-aged Wernecke Supergroup of northwest Laurentia; (2) sediments deposited from ca. 1650 to 1610 Ma show a unimodal proximal signature; and (3) postorogenic sediments deposited after 1550 Ma have detrital zircon age spectra like the Mount Isa Inlier of the North Australia craton. Along with new paleocurrent measurements, the detrital age data challenge current models that suggest that the Georgetown Inlier was part of Australia before ca. 1700 Ma. Rather, we argue it was a continental ribbon rifted from west Laurentia during slab rollback ca. 1680 Ma; by 1650 Ma, the Georgetown Inlier had completely separated from Laurentia, and ca. 1600 Ma collided with Australia during supercontinent Nuna amalgamation. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66630 10.1130/G39980.1 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL150100133 Geological Society of America restricted
spellingShingle Nordsvan, A.
Collins, W.
Li, Z.
Spencer, Christopher
Pourteau, Amaury
Withnall, I.
Betts, P.
Volante, S.
Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title_full Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title_fullStr Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title_full_unstemmed Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title_short Laurentian crust in northeast Australia: Implications for the assembly of the supercontinent Nuna
title_sort laurentian crust in northeast australia: implications for the assembly of the supercontinent nuna
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL150100133
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/66630