Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective review of magnetic resonance images. OBJECTIVE.: Examine the diagnostic accuracy, discriminative ability, and reliability of the sedimentation sign in a sample of patients with clinically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), low back pain (LBP), and vascular claudicat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomkins-Lane, C., Quint, D., Gabriel, S., Melloh, Markus, Haig, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6589
_version_ 1848745120090816512
author Tomkins-Lane, C.
Quint, D.
Gabriel, S.
Melloh, Markus
Haig, A.
author_facet Tomkins-Lane, C.
Quint, D.
Gabriel, S.
Melloh, Markus
Haig, A.
author_sort Tomkins-Lane, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective review of magnetic resonance images. OBJECTIVE.: Examine the diagnostic accuracy, discriminative ability, and reliability of the sedimentation sign in a sample of patients with clinically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), low back pain (LBP), and vascular claudication, and in asymptomatic controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: The nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was recently described as a new diagnostic test for LSS; however, the degree to which this sign is sensitive and specific in diagnosis of LSS is unknown. METHODS.: All LSS images were obtained from subjects who had clinically diagnosed LSS confirmed on imaging by a spine specialist. The other images were obtained from people with LBP but no LSS, people with severe vascular claudication, and asymptomatic participants. Three blinded raters independently assessed the images. A positive sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation at the level above or below the level of maximum stenosis. RESULTS.: Images from 148 subjects were reviewed (67 LSS, 31 LBP, 4 vascular, and 46 asymptomatic). Intrarater reliability for the sign ranged from ?= 0.87 to 0.97 and inter-rater reliability from 0.62 to 0.69. Sensitivity ranged from 42% to 66%, and specificity ranged from 49% to 78%. Sensitivity improved to a range of 60% to 96% when images with only a smallest cross-sectional area of the dural sac less than 80 mm were included. The sign was able to differentiate (P = 0.004) between LSS and asymptomatic controls but not between LSS and LBP or between LSS and vascular claudication. CONCLUSION.: The SedSign was shown to have high intrarater reliability and acceptable inter-rater reliability. The Sign appears most sensitive in defining severe LSS cases, yet may not aid in the differential diagnosis of LSS from LBP or vascular claudication, or add any specific diagnostic information beyond the traditional history, physical examination, and imaging studies that are standard in LSS diagnosis. © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:12:18Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-6589
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:12:18Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-65892018-03-29T09:05:43Z Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity Tomkins-Lane, C. Quint, D. Gabriel, S. Melloh, Markus Haig, A. STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective review of magnetic resonance images. OBJECTIVE.: Examine the diagnostic accuracy, discriminative ability, and reliability of the sedimentation sign in a sample of patients with clinically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), low back pain (LBP), and vascular claudication, and in asymptomatic controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: The nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was recently described as a new diagnostic test for LSS; however, the degree to which this sign is sensitive and specific in diagnosis of LSS is unknown. METHODS.: All LSS images were obtained from subjects who had clinically diagnosed LSS confirmed on imaging by a spine specialist. The other images were obtained from people with LBP but no LSS, people with severe vascular claudication, and asymptomatic participants. Three blinded raters independently assessed the images. A positive sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation at the level above or below the level of maximum stenosis. RESULTS.: Images from 148 subjects were reviewed (67 LSS, 31 LBP, 4 vascular, and 46 asymptomatic). Intrarater reliability for the sign ranged from ?= 0.87 to 0.97 and inter-rater reliability from 0.62 to 0.69. Sensitivity ranged from 42% to 66%, and specificity ranged from 49% to 78%. Sensitivity improved to a range of 60% to 96% when images with only a smallest cross-sectional area of the dural sac less than 80 mm were included. The sign was able to differentiate (P = 0.004) between LSS and asymptomatic controls but not between LSS and LBP or between LSS and vascular claudication. CONCLUSION.: The SedSign was shown to have high intrarater reliability and acceptable inter-rater reliability. The Sign appears most sensitive in defining severe LSS cases, yet may not aid in the differential diagnosis of LSS from LBP or vascular claudication, or add any specific diagnostic information beyond the traditional history, physical examination, and imaging studies that are standard in LSS diagnosis. © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6589 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8c2da restricted
spellingShingle Tomkins-Lane, C.
Quint, D.
Gabriel, S.
Melloh, Markus
Haig, A.
Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title_full Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title_fullStr Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title_full_unstemmed Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title_short Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
title_sort nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6589