DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis

Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 626 women undergoing 626 IVF cycles, where they received no adjuvant, GH alone, or GH-DHEA in combination. A small group received DHEA alone. The utilization of adjuvants was decided between the attending clinician and the patient depending on various...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keane, Kevin, Hinchliffe, P., Rowlands, P., Borude, G., Srinivasan, S., Dhaliwal, Satvinder, Yovich, John
Format: Journal Article
Published: Frontiers Research Foundation 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65871
_version_ 1848761221969346560
author Keane, Kevin
Hinchliffe, P.
Rowlands, P.
Borude, G.
Srinivasan, S.
Dhaliwal, Satvinder
Yovich, John
author_facet Keane, Kevin
Hinchliffe, P.
Rowlands, P.
Borude, G.
Srinivasan, S.
Dhaliwal, Satvinder
Yovich, John
author_sort Keane, Kevin
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 626 women undergoing 626 IVF cycles, where they received no adjuvant, GH alone, or GH-DHEA in combination. A small group received DHEA alone. The utilization of adjuvants was decided between the attending clinician and the patient depending on various factors including cost. Results: Despite patients being significantly older with lower ovarian reserve, live birth rates were significantly greater with GH alone (18.6%) and with GH-DHEA (13.0%) in comparison to those with no adjuvant (p < 0.003). No significant difference was observed between the GH groups (p = 0.181). Overall, patient age, quality of the transferred embryo, and GH treatment were the only significant independent predictors of live birth chance. Following adjustment for patient age, antral follicle count, and quality of transferred embryo, GH alone and GH-DHEA led to a 7.1-fold and 5.6-fold increase in live birth chance, respectively (p < 0.000). Conclusion: These data indicated that GH adjuvant may support more live births, particularly in younger women, and importantly, the positive effects of GH treatment were still observed even if DHEA was also used in combination. However, supplementation with DHEA did not indicate any potentiating benefit or modify the effects of GH treatment. Due to the retrospective design, and the risk of a selection bias, caution is advised in the interpretation of the data.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:28:14Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-65871
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:28:14Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-658712018-03-28T03:08:19Z DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis Keane, Kevin Hinchliffe, P. Rowlands, P. Borude, G. Srinivasan, S. Dhaliwal, Satvinder Yovich, John Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 626 women undergoing 626 IVF cycles, where they received no adjuvant, GH alone, or GH-DHEA in combination. A small group received DHEA alone. The utilization of adjuvants was decided between the attending clinician and the patient depending on various factors including cost. Results: Despite patients being significantly older with lower ovarian reserve, live birth rates were significantly greater with GH alone (18.6%) and with GH-DHEA (13.0%) in comparison to those with no adjuvant (p < 0.003). No significant difference was observed between the GH groups (p = 0.181). Overall, patient age, quality of the transferred embryo, and GH treatment were the only significant independent predictors of live birth chance. Following adjustment for patient age, antral follicle count, and quality of transferred embryo, GH alone and GH-DHEA led to a 7.1-fold and 5.6-fold increase in live birth chance, respectively (p < 0.000). Conclusion: These data indicated that GH adjuvant may support more live births, particularly in younger women, and importantly, the positive effects of GH treatment were still observed even if DHEA was also used in combination. However, supplementation with DHEA did not indicate any potentiating benefit or modify the effects of GH treatment. Due to the retrospective design, and the risk of a selection bias, caution is advised in the interpretation of the data. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65871 10.3389/fendo.2018.00014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers Research Foundation fulltext
spellingShingle Keane, Kevin
Hinchliffe, P.
Rowlands, P.
Borude, G.
Srinivasan, S.
Dhaliwal, Satvinder
Yovich, John
DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title_full DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title_fullStr DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title_full_unstemmed DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title_short DHEA supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF patients categorized as poor prognosis
title_sort dhea supplementation confers no additional benefit to that of growth hormone on pregnancy and live birth rates in ivf patients categorized as poor prognosis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65871