Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods

Copyright © The Authors 2016. Objective To undertake a systematic review to determine similarities and differences in metrics and results between recently and/or currently used tools, protocols and methods for monitoring Australian healthy food prices and affordability. Design Electronic databases o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lewis, M., Lee, Andy
Format: Journal Article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65702
_version_ 1848761185280720896
author Lewis, M.
Lee, Andy
author_facet Lewis, M.
Lee, Andy
author_sort Lewis, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Copyright © The Authors 2016. Objective To undertake a systematic review to determine similarities and differences in metrics and results between recently and/or currently used tools, protocols and methods for monitoring Australian healthy food prices and affordability. Design Electronic databases of peer-reviewed literature and online grey literature were systematically searched using the PRISMA approach for articles and reports relating to healthy food and diet price assessment tools, protocols, methods and results that utilised retail pricing. Setting National, state, regional and local areas of Australia from 1995 to 2015. Subjects Assessment tools, protocols and methods to measure the price of 'healthy' foods and diets. Results The search identified fifty-nine discrete surveys of 'healthy' food pricing incorporating six major food pricing tools (those used in multiple areas and time periods) and five minor food pricing tools (those used in a single survey area or time period). A nalysis demonstrated methodological differences regarding: included foods; reference households; use of availability and/or quality measures; household income sources; store sampling methods; data collection protocols; analysis methods; and results. Conclusions 'Healthy' food price assessment methods used in Australia lack comparability across all metrics and most do not fully align with a 'healthy' diet as recommended by the current Australian Dietary Guidelines. None have been applied nationally. Assessment of the price, price differential and affordability of healthy (recommended) and current (unhealthy) diets would provide more robust and meaningful data to inform health and fiscal policy in Australia. The INFORMAS 'optimal' approach provides a potential framework for development of these methods.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:27:39Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-65702
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:27:39Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-657022018-02-19T08:06:31Z Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods Lewis, M. Lee, Andy Copyright © The Authors 2016. Objective To undertake a systematic review to determine similarities and differences in metrics and results between recently and/or currently used tools, protocols and methods for monitoring Australian healthy food prices and affordability. Design Electronic databases of peer-reviewed literature and online grey literature were systematically searched using the PRISMA approach for articles and reports relating to healthy food and diet price assessment tools, protocols, methods and results that utilised retail pricing. Setting National, state, regional and local areas of Australia from 1995 to 2015. Subjects Assessment tools, protocols and methods to measure the price of 'healthy' foods and diets. Results The search identified fifty-nine discrete surveys of 'healthy' food pricing incorporating six major food pricing tools (those used in multiple areas and time periods) and five minor food pricing tools (those used in a single survey area or time period). A nalysis demonstrated methodological differences regarding: included foods; reference households; use of availability and/or quality measures; household income sources; store sampling methods; data collection protocols; analysis methods; and results. Conclusions 'Healthy' food price assessment methods used in Australia lack comparability across all metrics and most do not fully align with a 'healthy' diet as recommended by the current Australian Dietary Guidelines. None have been applied nationally. Assessment of the price, price differential and affordability of healthy (recommended) and current (unhealthy) diets would provide more robust and meaningful data to inform health and fiscal policy in Australia. The INFORMAS 'optimal' approach provides a potential framework for development of these methods. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65702 10.1017/S1368980016002160 Cambridge University Press unknown
spellingShingle Lewis, M.
Lee, Andy
Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title_full Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title_fullStr Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title_full_unstemmed Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title_short Costing 'healthy' food baskets in Australia - A systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
title_sort costing 'healthy' food baskets in australia - a systematic review of food price and affordability monitoring tools, protocols and methods
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/65702