Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in thediagnosis of coronary artery disease, based on a systematic review. Material and Methods: A search of PubMed/Medline and Sciencedirect databases in the English-language literature published over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al Moudi, M., Sun, Zhonghua, Lenzo, N.
Format: Journal Article
Published: University of Malaya 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6452
_version_ 1848745079940841472
author Al Moudi, M.
Sun, Zhonghua
Lenzo, N.
author_facet Al Moudi, M.
Sun, Zhonghua
Lenzo, N.
author_sort Al Moudi, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in thediagnosis of coronary artery disease, based on a systematic review. Material and Methods: A search of PubMed/Medline and Sciencedirect databases in the English-language literature published over the last 24 years was performed. Only studies with at least 10 patients comparing SPECT, PET or combined PET/CT with invasive coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (50% stenosis) were included for analysis. Sensitivities and specificities estimates pooled across studies were analysed using a Chisquare test.Results: Twenty-five studies met the selection criteria and were included for the analysis. Ten studies were performed with SPECT alone; while another six studies were performed with PET alone. Five studies were carried outwith both PET and SPECT modalities, and the remaining four studies were investigated with integrated PET-CT. Themean value of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these imaging modalities for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 82% (95%CI: 76 to 88), 76% (95%CI: 70 to 82) and 83% (95%CI: 77 to 89) for SPECT; 91% (95%CI: 85to 97), 89% (95%CI: 83 to 95) and 89% (95%CI: 83 to 95) for PET; and 85% (95%CI: 79 to 90), 83% (95%CI: 77 to 89)and 88% (95%CI: 82 to 94) for PET/CT, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of these imaging modalities wasdependent on the radiotracers used in these studies, with ammonia resulting in the highest diagnostic value.Conclusion: Our review shows that PET has high diagnostic value for diagnosing coronary artery disease, and this indicates that it is a valuable technique for both detection and prediction of coronary artery disease.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:11:40Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-6452
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:11:40Z
publishDate 2011
publisher University of Malaya
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-64522020-05-12T02:13:53Z Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review Al Moudi, M. Sun, Zhonghua Lenzo, N. Coronary artery disease single photon emission computed tomography computed tomography positron emission tomography diagnostic value Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in thediagnosis of coronary artery disease, based on a systematic review. Material and Methods: A search of PubMed/Medline and Sciencedirect databases in the English-language literature published over the last 24 years was performed. Only studies with at least 10 patients comparing SPECT, PET or combined PET/CT with invasive coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (50% stenosis) were included for analysis. Sensitivities and specificities estimates pooled across studies were analysed using a Chisquare test.Results: Twenty-five studies met the selection criteria and were included for the analysis. Ten studies were performed with SPECT alone; while another six studies were performed with PET alone. Five studies were carried outwith both PET and SPECT modalities, and the remaining four studies were investigated with integrated PET-CT. Themean value of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these imaging modalities for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 82% (95%CI: 76 to 88), 76% (95%CI: 70 to 82) and 83% (95%CI: 77 to 89) for SPECT; 91% (95%CI: 85to 97), 89% (95%CI: 83 to 95) and 89% (95%CI: 83 to 95) for PET; and 85% (95%CI: 79 to 90), 83% (95%CI: 77 to 89)and 88% (95%CI: 82 to 94) for PET/CT, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of these imaging modalities wasdependent on the radiotracers used in these studies, with ammonia resulting in the highest diagnostic value.Conclusion: Our review shows that PET has high diagnostic value for diagnosing coronary artery disease, and this indicates that it is a valuable technique for both detection and prediction of coronary artery disease. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6452 10.2349/biij.7.2.e9 University of Malaya fulltext
spellingShingle Coronary artery disease
single photon emission computed tomography
computed tomography
positron emission tomography
diagnostic value
Al Moudi, M.
Sun, Zhonghua
Lenzo, N.
Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title_full Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title_short Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review
title_sort diagnostic value of spect, pet and pet/ct in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review
topic Coronary artery disease
single photon emission computed tomography
computed tomography
positron emission tomography
diagnostic value
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6452