Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common cardiac procedure used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. Patient-centred care is a priority in cardiovascular health having been shown to increase patient satisfaction, engagement with re...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63871 |
| _version_ | 1848761118252597248 |
|---|---|
| author | Ayton, D. Barker, A. Peeters, G. Berkovic, D. Lefkovits, J. Brennan, A. Evans, S. Zalcberg, J. Reid, Christopher Stoelwinder, J. Mcneil, J. |
| author_facet | Ayton, D. Barker, A. Peeters, G. Berkovic, D. Lefkovits, J. Brennan, A. Evans, S. Zalcberg, J. Reid, Christopher Stoelwinder, J. Mcneil, J. |
| author_sort | Ayton, D. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common cardiac procedure used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. Patient-centred care is a priority in cardiovascular health having been shown to increase patient satisfaction, engagement with rehabilitation activities and reduce anxiety. Evidence indicates that patient-centred care is best achieved by routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have limited the patient involvement in their development. Aims: To identify and explore outcomes, patients perceive as important following PCI. Methods: A qualitative design was adopted. Eight focus groups and five semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients who had undergone PCI in the previous 6 months. Outcomes were identified and mapped under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) patient-reported outcome (PROs) domains of feeling (physical and psychological outcomes), function and evaluation. Inductive and deductive analysis methods were used with open, axial and thematic coding. Results: Consistent with prior studies, patients identified feeling and function outcomes such as reductions in physical and psychological symptoms and the ability to perform usual activities as important. Participants also identified a range of new outcomes, including confidence to return to usual activities and evaluation domains such as adverse effects of medications and the importance of patient communication. Conclusion: The findings of this research should be considered in the design of a cardiac PROM for PCI patients. A PROM which adequately assesses these outcomes can provide clinicians and hospital staff with a foundation in which to address these concerns or symptoms. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:26:35Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-63871 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:26:35Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-638712018-02-06T12:07:21Z Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study Ayton, D. Barker, A. Peeters, G. Berkovic, D. Lefkovits, J. Brennan, A. Evans, S. Zalcberg, J. Reid, Christopher Stoelwinder, J. Mcneil, J. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common cardiac procedure used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. Patient-centred care is a priority in cardiovascular health having been shown to increase patient satisfaction, engagement with rehabilitation activities and reduce anxiety. Evidence indicates that patient-centred care is best achieved by routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have limited the patient involvement in their development. Aims: To identify and explore outcomes, patients perceive as important following PCI. Methods: A qualitative design was adopted. Eight focus groups and five semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients who had undergone PCI in the previous 6 months. Outcomes were identified and mapped under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) patient-reported outcome (PROs) domains of feeling (physical and psychological outcomes), function and evaluation. Inductive and deductive analysis methods were used with open, axial and thematic coding. Results: Consistent with prior studies, patients identified feeling and function outcomes such as reductions in physical and psychological symptoms and the ability to perform usual activities as important. Participants also identified a range of new outcomes, including confidence to return to usual activities and evaluation domains such as adverse effects of medications and the importance of patient communication. Conclusion: The findings of this research should be considered in the design of a cardiac PROM for PCI patients. A PROM which adequately assesses these outcomes can provide clinicians and hospital staff with a foundation in which to address these concerns or symptoms. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63871 10.1111/hex.12636 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. unknown |
| spellingShingle | Ayton, D. Barker, A. Peeters, G. Berkovic, D. Lefkovits, J. Brennan, A. Evans, S. Zalcberg, J. Reid, Christopher Stoelwinder, J. Mcneil, J. Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title | Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title_full | Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title_fullStr | Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title_short | Exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A qualitative study |
| title_sort | exploring patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a qualitative study |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63871 |