Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia

© 2016 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited Purpose: Within the current literature, positive intervention effects demonstrate the significant potential for people with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) to learn/relearn words. Generalisation of intervention effects to other words and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beales, A., Cartwright, Jade, Whitworth, Anne, Panegyres, P.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Informa Healthcare 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63457
_version_ 1848761092695654400
author Beales, A.
Cartwright, Jade
Whitworth, Anne
Panegyres, P.
author_facet Beales, A.
Cartwright, Jade
Whitworth, Anne
Panegyres, P.
author_sort Beales, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2016 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited Purpose: Within the current literature, positive intervention effects demonstrate the significant potential for people with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) to learn/relearn words. Generalisation of intervention effects to other words and/or other contexts, however, remains unclear. Method: This multiple baseline, case-series design investigated the effects of a self-cueing lexical retrieval intervention across word classes (nouns, verbs and adjectives) on four individuals with PPA, three suggestive of the semantic variant and one of the logopenic variant. The intervention integrated semantic, phonological and orthographic levels of language production and drew on autobiographical memory. Changes in accuracy in retrieving treated and untreated items (pre-intervention, post-intervention and 4-weeks maintenance) were determined using the Cochran’s Q test, with follow-up McNemar pairwise comparisons. Result: All participants showed significant improvements in naming treated items, across all word classes. Different patterns of generalised improvement to untreated words were found for each participant. In discourse, the semantic variant participants demonstrated a significant increase in correct information units, in contrast to the participant with the logopenic variant who remained stable. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that people with PPA can show improved lexical retrieval following intervention. The findings suggest possible differences in generalisation across word classes and according to underlying deficit.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:26:11Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-63457
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:26:11Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Informa Healthcare
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-634572018-02-06T07:40:43Z Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia Beales, A. Cartwright, Jade Whitworth, Anne Panegyres, P. © 2016 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited Purpose: Within the current literature, positive intervention effects demonstrate the significant potential for people with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) to learn/relearn words. Generalisation of intervention effects to other words and/or other contexts, however, remains unclear. Method: This multiple baseline, case-series design investigated the effects of a self-cueing lexical retrieval intervention across word classes (nouns, verbs and adjectives) on four individuals with PPA, three suggestive of the semantic variant and one of the logopenic variant. The intervention integrated semantic, phonological and orthographic levels of language production and drew on autobiographical memory. Changes in accuracy in retrieving treated and untreated items (pre-intervention, post-intervention and 4-weeks maintenance) were determined using the Cochran’s Q test, with follow-up McNemar pairwise comparisons. Result: All participants showed significant improvements in naming treated items, across all word classes. Different patterns of generalised improvement to untreated words were found for each participant. In discourse, the semantic variant participants demonstrated a significant increase in correct information units, in contrast to the participant with the logopenic variant who remained stable. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that people with PPA can show improved lexical retrieval following intervention. The findings suggest possible differences in generalisation across word classes and according to underlying deficit. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63457 10.3109/17549507.2016.1151936 Informa Healthcare restricted
spellingShingle Beales, A.
Cartwright, Jade
Whitworth, Anne
Panegyres, P.
Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title_full Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title_fullStr Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title_short Exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
title_sort exploring generalisation processes following lexical retrieval intervention in primary progressive aphasia
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63457