Self-Control, Self-Regulation, and Doping in Sport: A Test of the Strength-Energy Model

We applied the strength-energy model of self-control to understand the relationship between self-control and young athletes’ behavioral responses to taking illegal performance-enhancing substances, or “doping.” Measures of trait self-control, attitude and intention toward doping, intention toward, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chan, Derwin, Lentillon-Kaestner, V., Dimmock, J., Donovan, Robert, Keatley, D., Hardcastle, Sarah, Hagger, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Published: Human Kinetics 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6321
Description
Summary:We applied the strength-energy model of self-control to understand the relationship between self-control and young athletes’ behavioral responses to taking illegal performance-enhancing substances, or “doping.” Measures of trait self-control, attitude and intention toward doping, intention toward, and adherence to, doping-avoidant behaviors, and the prevention of unintended doping behaviors were administered to 410 young Australian athletes. Participants also completed a “lollipop” decision-making protocol that simulated avoidance of unintended doping. Hierarchical linear multiple regression analyses revealed that self-control was negatively associated with doping attitude and intention, and positively associated with the intention and adherence to doping-avoidant behaviors, and refusal to take or eat the unfamiliar candy offered in the “lollipop” protocol. Consistent with the strength-energy model, athletes with low self-control were more likely to have heightened attitude and intention toward doping, and reduced intention, behavioral adherence, and awareness of doping avoidance.