A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries

This study compared the catch composition,catch per unit eVort, and incidental impacts of spearWshersand lineWshers engaged in a structured Wshing programwhereby Wshing eVort was standardized across time, spaceand skill level. It was found that (1) the catch compositionof both groups of Wshers overl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frisch, A., Baker, R., Hobbs, Jean-Paul, Nankervis, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scsagr.scsfri.ac.cn/upimg/200854164925.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6294
_version_ 1848745034799644672
author Frisch, A.
Baker, R.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Nankervis, L.
author_facet Frisch, A.
Baker, R.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Nankervis, L.
author_sort Frisch, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study compared the catch composition,catch per unit eVort, and incidental impacts of spearWshersand lineWshers engaged in a structured Wshing programwhereby Wshing eVort was standardized across time, spaceand skill level. It was found that (1) the catch compositionof both groups of Wshers overlapped considerably, (2) thenumbers of target Wsh caught by spearWshers (156) andlineWshers (168) were not signiWcantly diVerent, (3) themean size of target Wsh caught by spearWshers (1.95 § 0.1 kg,§SE) was signiWcantly larger than the mean size of targetWsh caught by lineWshers (1.27 § 0.06 kg), and (4) spear-Wshers retained 43% more biomass of target species thandid lineWshers (304 versus 213 kg, respectively). However,lineWshers used »1 kg of bait for every 3 kg of target Wshthat were captured. LineWshers also caught far more undersized,undesirable, or protected Wshes (i.e., bycatch) andcaused far more pollution (i.e., lost gear) than did spearWshers.It is concluded that the overall impacts of recreationalspearWshing and lineWshing on Wshery resources of theGreat Barrier Reef are broadly equivalent (per unit of WshingeVort), and that management regulations should be applied equitably across both Wshing sectors. A management strategyof this type will simplify enforcement of Wsheries regulationsand avoid discrimination of particular Wshers in localcommunities where both Wshing methods are socially orculturally important.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:10:57Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-6294
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:10:57Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Verlag
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-62942017-02-28T01:30:24Z A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries Frisch, A. Baker, R. Hobbs, Jean-Paul Nankervis, L. Bycatch Catch per unit Coral trout Linefishing effort Selectivity SpearWshing This study compared the catch composition,catch per unit eVort, and incidental impacts of spearWshersand lineWshers engaged in a structured Wshing programwhereby Wshing eVort was standardized across time, spaceand skill level. It was found that (1) the catch compositionof both groups of Wshers overlapped considerably, (2) thenumbers of target Wsh caught by spearWshers (156) andlineWshers (168) were not signiWcantly diVerent, (3) themean size of target Wsh caught by spearWshers (1.95 § 0.1 kg,§SE) was signiWcantly larger than the mean size of targetWsh caught by lineWshers (1.27 § 0.06 kg), and (4) spear-Wshers retained 43% more biomass of target species thandid lineWshers (304 versus 213 kg, respectively). However,lineWshers used »1 kg of bait for every 3 kg of target Wshthat were captured. LineWshers also caught far more undersized,undesirable, or protected Wshes (i.e., bycatch) andcaused far more pollution (i.e., lost gear) than did spearWshers.It is concluded that the overall impacts of recreationalspearWshing and lineWshing on Wshery resources of theGreat Barrier Reef are broadly equivalent (per unit of WshingeVort), and that management regulations should be applied equitably across both Wshing sectors. A management strategyof this type will simplify enforcement of Wsheries regulationsand avoid discrimination of particular Wshers in localcommunities where both Wshing methods are socially orculturally important. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6294 http://scsagr.scsfri.ac.cn/upimg/200854164925.pdf Springer Verlag restricted
spellingShingle Bycatch
Catch per unit
Coral trout
Linefishing
effort
Selectivity
SpearWshing
Frisch, A.
Baker, R.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Nankervis, L.
A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title_full A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title_fullStr A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title_short A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
title_sort quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the great barrier reef: implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries
topic Bycatch
Catch per unit
Coral trout
Linefishing
effort
Selectivity
SpearWshing
url http://scsagr.scsfri.ac.cn/upimg/200854164925.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6294