Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators

© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group There is a paucity of research, training, and material available to support supervisors of undergraduate dissertation students. This article explores what ‘good’ supervision might look like at this level. Interviews were conducted wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberts, Lynne, Seaman, Kristen
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62834
_version_ 1848760923841363968
author Roberts, Lynne
Seaman, Kristen
author_facet Roberts, Lynne
Seaman, Kristen
author_sort Roberts, Lynne
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group There is a paucity of research, training, and material available to support supervisors of undergraduate dissertation students. This article explores what ‘good’ supervision might look like at this level. Interviews were conducted with eight new supervisors and six dissertation coordinators using a critical incident methodology. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts indicated that both supervisors (themes ‘directed and clear advice’ and ‘instilling confidence’) and students (themes ‘interest in topic’ and ‘ownership’) contributed to ‘good’ supervisory experiences (theme ‘evolving relationships’). Issues affecting this process were identified. Resources developed from these findings may be adapted by academic developers for supporting new dissertation supervisors.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:30Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-62834
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:30Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-628342020-07-22T05:53:21Z Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators Roberts, Lynne Seaman, Kristen © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group There is a paucity of research, training, and material available to support supervisors of undergraduate dissertation students. This article explores what ‘good’ supervision might look like at this level. Interviews were conducted with eight new supervisors and six dissertation coordinators using a critical incident methodology. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts indicated that both supervisors (themes ‘directed and clear advice’ and ‘instilling confidence’) and students (themes ‘interest in topic’ and ‘ownership’) contributed to ‘good’ supervisory experiences (theme ‘evolving relationships’). Issues affecting this process were identified. Resources developed from these findings may be adapted by academic developers for supporting new dissertation supervisors. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62834 10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412971 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Roberts, Lynne
Seaman, Kristen
Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title_full Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title_fullStr Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title_full_unstemmed Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title_short Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
title_sort good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62834