Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country

Copyright © 2014 Cambridge University Press.Obesity is pandemic, but no consensus has yet emerged regarding appropriate tools for measuring it. Medical research based on populations in the developed world has largely dismissed body mass index (BMI) because it is a weak predictor of some health outco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sohn, Kitae
Format: Journal Article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62830
_version_ 1848760923301347328
author Sohn, Kitae
author_facet Sohn, Kitae
author_sort Sohn, Kitae
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Copyright © 2014 Cambridge University Press.Obesity is pandemic, but no consensus has yet emerged regarding appropriate tools for measuring it. Medical research based on populations in the developed world has largely dismissed body mass index (BMI) because it is a weak predictor of some health outcomes. In contrast, social science research still relies on it for its simplicity and ready availability in surveys. This paper uses consistent definitions and measures to select sufficiently good predictors of health and economic outcomes from among the anthropometrics that are considered alternatives to BMI. The results from the Indonesian Family Life Survey indicate that BMI and waist circumference are better predictors than waist-to-height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio. This paper argues that given its advantages, BMI is an adequate measure of obesity for Indonesia and possibly for the developing world. Further, if BMI is to be replaced, waist circumference is preferable to other anthropometrics.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:29Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-62830
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:29Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Cambridge University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-628302018-02-01T05:58:35Z Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country Sohn, Kitae Copyright © 2014 Cambridge University Press.Obesity is pandemic, but no consensus has yet emerged regarding appropriate tools for measuring it. Medical research based on populations in the developed world has largely dismissed body mass index (BMI) because it is a weak predictor of some health outcomes. In contrast, social science research still relies on it for its simplicity and ready availability in surveys. This paper uses consistent definitions and measures to select sufficiently good predictors of health and economic outcomes from among the anthropometrics that are considered alternatives to BMI. The results from the Indonesian Family Life Survey indicate that BMI and waist circumference are better predictors than waist-to-height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio. This paper argues that given its advantages, BMI is an adequate measure of obesity for Indonesia and possibly for the developing world. Further, if BMI is to be replaced, waist circumference is preferable to other anthropometrics. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62830 10.1017/S0021932013000692 Cambridge University Press restricted
spellingShingle Sohn, Kitae
Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title_full Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title_fullStr Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title_full_unstemmed Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title_short Sufficiently good measures of obesity: The case of a developing country
title_sort sufficiently good measures of obesity: the case of a developing country
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62830