Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Speyer, R., Denman, D., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Chen, Y., Bogaardt, H., Kim, J., Heckathorn, D., Cordier, Reinie
Format: Journal Article
Published: Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62727
_version_ 1848760904162738176
author Speyer, R.
Denman, D.
Wilkes-Gillan, S.
Chen, Y.
Bogaardt, H.
Kim, J.
Heckathorn, D.
Cordier, Reinie
author_facet Speyer, R.
Denman, D.
Wilkes-Gillan, S.
Chen, Y.
Bogaardt, H.
Kim, J.
Heckathorn, D.
Cordier, Reinie
author_sort Speyer, R.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description OBJECTIVE: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. The content of relevant journals and published articles were also searched. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining the effectiveness of allied health and nursing telehealth interventions for rural and remote populations were included in descriptive analyses. Studies comparing telehealth intervention with standard face-to-face interventions grouped by type of intervention approach were used to examine between-groups effect sizes. DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality of studies was rated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy levels. DATA SYNTHESIS: After quality ratings, 43 studies were included. A majority of studies had strong methodological quality. The disciplines of psychology and nursing were represented most frequently, as were studies using a cognitive intervention approach. Meta-analysis results slightly favoured telehealth interventions compared with face-to-face interventions, but did not show significant differences. Interventions using a combined physical and cognitive approach appeared to be more effective. CONCLUSION: Telehealth services may be as effective as face-to-face interventions, which is encouraging given the potential benefits of telehealth in rural and remote areas with regards to healthcare access and time and cost savings.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:11Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-62727
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:23:11Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-627272018-02-01T05:58:34Z Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Speyer, R. Denman, D. Wilkes-Gillan, S. Chen, Y. Bogaardt, H. Kim, J. Heckathorn, D. Cordier, Reinie OBJECTIVE: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. The content of relevant journals and published articles were also searched. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining the effectiveness of allied health and nursing telehealth interventions for rural and remote populations were included in descriptive analyses. Studies comparing telehealth intervention with standard face-to-face interventions grouped by type of intervention approach were used to examine between-groups effect sizes. DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality of studies was rated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy levels. DATA SYNTHESIS: After quality ratings, 43 studies were included. A majority of studies had strong methodological quality. The disciplines of psychology and nursing were represented most frequently, as were studies using a cognitive intervention approach. Meta-analysis results slightly favoured telehealth interventions compared with face-to-face interventions, but did not show significant differences. Interventions using a combined physical and cognitive approach appeared to be more effective. CONCLUSION: Telehealth services may be as effective as face-to-face interventions, which is encouraging given the potential benefits of telehealth in rural and remote areas with regards to healthcare access and time and cost savings. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62727 10.2340/16501977-2297 Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation unknown
spellingShingle Speyer, R.
Denman, D.
Wilkes-Gillan, S.
Chen, Y.
Bogaardt, H.
Kim, J.
Heckathorn, D.
Cordier, Reinie
Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62727