Capital-gender complementarity

Is capital more complementary to one of the genders? More specifically, which types of capital are complementary to which gender? This paper presents a first attempt at estimating capital-gender complementarities, at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. By employing a panel of 12 OECD countries...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raveh, Ohad
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62320
_version_ 1848760829320626176
author Raveh, Ohad
author_facet Raveh, Ohad
author_sort Raveh, Ohad
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Is capital more complementary to one of the genders? More specifically, which types of capital are complementary to which gender? This paper presents a first attempt at estimating capital-gender complementarities, at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. By employing a panel of 12 OECD countries covering the period of 1970-2005, I find that: a) at the aggregated level capital is, on average, more complementary to male labor; b) at the disaggregated level (non) ICT capital is more complementary to (male) female labor, yet the magnitude of complementarity is higher for male labor; c) these patterns hold for different skill groups, and intensify with skill.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:22:00Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-62320
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:22:00Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-623202018-02-01T05:22:55Z Capital-gender complementarity Raveh, Ohad Is capital more complementary to one of the genders? More specifically, which types of capital are complementary to which gender? This paper presents a first attempt at estimating capital-gender complementarities, at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. By employing a panel of 12 OECD countries covering the period of 1970-2005, I find that: a) at the aggregated level capital is, on average, more complementary to male labor; b) at the disaggregated level (non) ICT capital is more complementary to (male) female labor, yet the magnitude of complementarity is higher for male labor; c) these patterns hold for different skill groups, and intensify with skill. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62320 http://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer restricted
spellingShingle Raveh, Ohad
Capital-gender complementarity
title Capital-gender complementarity
title_full Capital-gender complementarity
title_fullStr Capital-gender complementarity
title_full_unstemmed Capital-gender complementarity
title_short Capital-gender complementarity
title_sort capital-gender complementarity
url http://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62320