The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy

Aim: To determine (1) the reproducibility of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS); (2) EDACS classification distribution in a population-based cohort with cerebral palsy (CP); and (3) the relationships between the EDACS and clinical mealtime assessment, other classifications...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benfer, K., Weir, K., Bell, K., Ware, R., Davies, P., Boyd, Roslyn
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61179
_version_ 1848760666004914176
author Benfer, K.
Weir, K.
Bell, K.
Ware, R.
Davies, P.
Boyd, Roslyn
author_facet Benfer, K.
Weir, K.
Bell, K.
Ware, R.
Davies, P.
Boyd, Roslyn
author_sort Benfer, K.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: To determine (1) the reproducibility of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS); (2) EDACS classification distribution in a population-based cohort with cerebral palsy (CP); and (3) the relationships between the EDACS and clinical mealtime assessment, other classifications, and health outcomes. Method: This was a cross-sectional population-based cohort study of 170 children with CP at 3 years to 5 years (mean 57.6mo, standard deviation [SD] 8.3mo; 105 males, n=65 females). Functional abilities were representative of a population sample (Gross Motor Function Classification System level I=74, II=34, III=21, IV=18, V=23). The EDACS was the primary classification of mealtime function. The Dysphagia Disorders Survey was the clinical mealtime assessment. Gross motor function was classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Results: EDACS classification had 88.3% intrarater agreement (?=0.84, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.95; p < 0.001) and 51.7% interrater agreement (?=0.36, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.79; p < 0.001). In total, 56.5% of children were classified as EDACS level I. There was a strong stepwise relationship between the Dysphagia Disorders Survey and EDACS (r=0.96, p < 0.001). Parental stress (odds ratio=1.3, p=0.05) and feeding tubes (odds ratio=6.4, p < 0.001) were significantly related to more limited function on the EDACS. Interpretation: The EDACS presents a viable adjunct to clinical assessment of feeding skills in children with CP for use in surveillance trials and clinical practice. A rating addendum would be a useful contribution to the tool to enhance reproducibility.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:19:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-61179
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:19:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-611792018-05-23T05:53:31Z The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy Benfer, K. Weir, K. Bell, K. Ware, R. Davies, P. Boyd, Roslyn Aim: To determine (1) the reproducibility of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS); (2) EDACS classification distribution in a population-based cohort with cerebral palsy (CP); and (3) the relationships between the EDACS and clinical mealtime assessment, other classifications, and health outcomes. Method: This was a cross-sectional population-based cohort study of 170 children with CP at 3 years to 5 years (mean 57.6mo, standard deviation [SD] 8.3mo; 105 males, n=65 females). Functional abilities were representative of a population sample (Gross Motor Function Classification System level I=74, II=34, III=21, IV=18, V=23). The EDACS was the primary classification of mealtime function. The Dysphagia Disorders Survey was the clinical mealtime assessment. Gross motor function was classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Results: EDACS classification had 88.3% intrarater agreement (?=0.84, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.95; p < 0.001) and 51.7% interrater agreement (?=0.36, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.79; p < 0.001). In total, 56.5% of children were classified as EDACS level I. There was a strong stepwise relationship between the Dysphagia Disorders Survey and EDACS (r=0.96, p < 0.001). Parental stress (odds ratio=1.3, p=0.05) and feeding tubes (odds ratio=6.4, p < 0.001) were significantly related to more limited function on the EDACS. Interpretation: The EDACS presents a viable adjunct to clinical assessment of feeding skills in children with CP for use in surveillance trials and clinical practice. A rating addendum would be a useful contribution to the tool to enhance reproducibility. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61179 10.1111/dmcn.13403 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Benfer, K.
Weir, K.
Bell, K.
Ware, R.
Davies, P.
Boyd, Roslyn
The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title_full The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title_fullStr The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title_full_unstemmed The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title_short The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
title_sort eating and drinking ability classification system in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61179