Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites

This paper compares strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene (PE) fibre reinforced two types of geopolymer composites. The first composite is heat cured fly ash based geopolymer composite while the other is ambient air cured fly ash and slag blended geopolymer composite. C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaikh, Faiz, Fairchild, A., Zammar, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61012
_version_ 1848760653908541440
author Shaikh, Faiz
Fairchild, A.
Zammar, R.
author_facet Shaikh, Faiz
Fairchild, A.
Zammar, R.
author_sort Shaikh, Faiz
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper compares strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene (PE) fibre reinforced two types of geopolymer composites. The first composite is heat cured fly ash based geopolymer composite while the other is ambient air cured fly ash and slag blended geopolymer composite. Comparison is also made with counterpart ordinary Portland cement (OPC) based composite. Effect of different volume fractions of PE fibre on compressive strength, strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour of above three composites is evaluated and a critical volume fraction of PE fibre is identified. Results show that both heat and ambient cured geopolymer composites exhibited better strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour than their counterpart OPC based composite containing same volume fraction of PE fibre. Results also show that the geopolymer composites and cement composite containing PE fibre volume fractions of 0.75–1.0% exhibit the highest ultimate tensile strain, deflection at peak load and maximum number of multiple cracks than other fibre contents. Compressive strength of OPC composite is higher than that of both geopolymer composites. Among geopolymer composites, the ambient cured geopolymer (AGP) composite exhibited much higher deflection capacity at peak load than heat cured geopolymer (HGP) under three-point load. Similar behaviour is also observed in uni-axial tension. Scanning electron microscopic analysis shows adherence of higher amount of cement matrix and geopolymer gel on PE fibre in cement and heat cured geopolymer composite that that on PF fibre in ambient cured geopolymer composite. This indicates the likely hood of higher frictional bond of PE fibre with matrix in cement and heat cured geopolymer than in ambient cured geopolymer.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:19:12Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-61012
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:19:12Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-610122018-07-04T01:58:15Z Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites Shaikh, Faiz Fairchild, A. Zammar, R. This paper compares strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene (PE) fibre reinforced two types of geopolymer composites. The first composite is heat cured fly ash based geopolymer composite while the other is ambient air cured fly ash and slag blended geopolymer composite. Comparison is also made with counterpart ordinary Portland cement (OPC) based composite. Effect of different volume fractions of PE fibre on compressive strength, strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour of above three composites is evaluated and a critical volume fraction of PE fibre is identified. Results show that both heat and ambient cured geopolymer composites exhibited better strain hardening and deflection hardening behaviour than their counterpart OPC based composite containing same volume fraction of PE fibre. Results also show that the geopolymer composites and cement composite containing PE fibre volume fractions of 0.75–1.0% exhibit the highest ultimate tensile strain, deflection at peak load and maximum number of multiple cracks than other fibre contents. Compressive strength of OPC composite is higher than that of both geopolymer composites. Among geopolymer composites, the ambient cured geopolymer (AGP) composite exhibited much higher deflection capacity at peak load than heat cured geopolymer (HGP) under three-point load. Similar behaviour is also observed in uni-axial tension. Scanning electron microscopic analysis shows adherence of higher amount of cement matrix and geopolymer gel on PE fibre in cement and heat cured geopolymer composite that that on PF fibre in ambient cured geopolymer composite. This indicates the likely hood of higher frictional bond of PE fibre with matrix in cement and heat cured geopolymer than in ambient cured geopolymer. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61012 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.175 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Shaikh, Faiz
Fairchild, A.
Zammar, R.
Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title_full Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title_fullStr Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title_full_unstemmed Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title_short Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
title_sort comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/61012