Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences

The literature on dictator (D) and joy-of-destruction (JoD) games demonstrates that some people can be nice and some people can be nasty. We study, by way of an experiment with between-subjects and within-subjects features, to what extent social preferences are consistent or context dependent. We fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Lyla, Ortmann, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6012
_version_ 1848744955831386112
author Zhang, Lyla
Ortmann, A.
author_facet Zhang, Lyla
Ortmann, A.
author_sort Zhang, Lyla
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The literature on dictator (D) and joy-of-destruction (JoD) games demonstrates that some people can be nice and some people can be nasty. We study, by way of an experiment with between-subjects and within-subjects features, to what extent social preferences are consistent or context dependent. We find that participants' giving amount in D games, and the amount they destroy in JoD games, depends on the choice set. While the choice set strongly affects participants' giving decisions, its effect on participants' destruction decisions is much weaker. We observe inconsistent choices (giving in D games and destroying in JoD games) for about one in five subjects but also find this mixed-motive preference dramatically reduces when the choice sets of standard D and JoD games are enlarged. Most of our participants are selfish although they also tend to make choices that increase social welfare when given the opportunity. The Machiavellian attitudes we elicited predict the giving amount in D games but not the destruction amount in JoD games.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:09:41Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-6012
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:09:41Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-60122017-09-13T14:42:16Z Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences Zhang, Lyla Ortmann, A. The literature on dictator (D) and joy-of-destruction (JoD) games demonstrates that some people can be nice and some people can be nasty. We study, by way of an experiment with between-subjects and within-subjects features, to what extent social preferences are consistent or context dependent. We find that participants' giving amount in D games, and the amount they destroy in JoD games, depends on the choice set. While the choice set strongly affects participants' giving decisions, its effect on participants' destruction decisions is much weaker. We observe inconsistent choices (giving in D games and destroying in JoD games) for about one in five subjects but also find this mixed-motive preference dramatically reduces when the choice sets of standard D and JoD games are enlarged. Most of our participants are selfish although they also tend to make choices that increase social welfare when given the opportunity. The Machiavellian attitudes we elicited predict the giving amount in D games but not the destruction amount in JoD games. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6012 10.1016/j.socec.2016.03.001 restricted
spellingShingle Zhang, Lyla
Ortmann, A.
Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title_full Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title_fullStr Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title_full_unstemmed Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title_short Pro-social or anti-social, or both? A within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
title_sort pro-social or anti-social, or both? a within- and between-subjects study of social preferences
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6012