Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis

With the combination of emerging GNSSs, single-frequency (SF) precise RTK positioning becomes possible. In this contribution we evaluate such low-cost ublox receiver and antenna performance when combining real data of four CDMA systems, namely L1 GPS, E1 Galileo, L1 QZSS, and B1 BDS. Comparisons are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Odolinski, R., Teunissen, Peter
Format: Journal Article
Published: IOP Publishing Ltd 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/60027
_version_ 1848760574555455488
author Odolinski, R.
Teunissen, Peter
author_facet Odolinski, R.
Teunissen, Peter
author_sort Odolinski, R.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description With the combination of emerging GNSSs, single-frequency (SF) precise RTK positioning becomes possible. In this contribution we evaluate such low-cost ublox receiver and antenna performance when combining real data of four CDMA systems, namely L1 GPS, E1 Galileo, L1 QZSS, and B1 BDS. Comparisons are made to more expensive dual-frequency (DF) GPS receivers and antennas. The formal and empirical ambiguity success rates and positioning precisions will first be evaluated while making use of L1+E1, so as to investigate whether instantaneous SF RTK is possible without the need of B1 BDS or L1 QZSS. This is followed by an analysis of the SF 4-system model performance when the residual ionosphere can be ignored and modeled as a function of the baseline length, respectively. The analyses are conducted for a location in Dunedin, New Zealand, and compared to Perth, Australia with the better visibility of BDS and QZSS. The results indicate that successful instantaneous and precise RTK positioning is feasible while using L1 GPS and E1 Galileo data, and that the SF 4-system model is competitive to DF GPS even when residual ionospheric delays are present. We finally demonstrate that when the impact from the ionosphere increases and more than one epoch is needed for successful ambiguity resolution, the SF 4-system model performance can still remain competitive with the DF GPS receivers. This is particularly true in Perth with more satellites and when higher than customary elevation cut-off angles need to be used to avoid low-elevation multipath.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:17:57Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-60027
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:17:57Z
publishDate 2017
publisher IOP Publishing Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-600272018-11-30T06:30:56Z Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis Odolinski, R. Teunissen, Peter With the combination of emerging GNSSs, single-frequency (SF) precise RTK positioning becomes possible. In this contribution we evaluate such low-cost ublox receiver and antenna performance when combining real data of four CDMA systems, namely L1 GPS, E1 Galileo, L1 QZSS, and B1 BDS. Comparisons are made to more expensive dual-frequency (DF) GPS receivers and antennas. The formal and empirical ambiguity success rates and positioning precisions will first be evaluated while making use of L1+E1, so as to investigate whether instantaneous SF RTK is possible without the need of B1 BDS or L1 QZSS. This is followed by an analysis of the SF 4-system model performance when the residual ionosphere can be ignored and modeled as a function of the baseline length, respectively. The analyses are conducted for a location in Dunedin, New Zealand, and compared to Perth, Australia with the better visibility of BDS and QZSS. The results indicate that successful instantaneous and precise RTK positioning is feasible while using L1 GPS and E1 Galileo data, and that the SF 4-system model is competitive to DF GPS even when residual ionospheric delays are present. We finally demonstrate that when the impact from the ionosphere increases and more than one epoch is needed for successful ambiguity resolution, the SF 4-system model performance can still remain competitive with the DF GPS receivers. This is particularly true in Perth with more satellites and when higher than customary elevation cut-off angles need to be used to avoid low-elevation multipath. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/60027 10.1088/1361-6501/aa92eb IOP Publishing Ltd fulltext
spellingShingle Odolinski, R.
Teunissen, Peter
Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title_full Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title_fullStr Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title_full_unstemmed Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title_short Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis
title_sort low-cost, 4-system, precise gnss positioning: a gps, galileo, bds and qzss ionosphere-weighted rtk analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/60027