Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry
The H.264/AVC standard, popular in commercial video recording and distribution, has also been widely adopted for high-definition video compression in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance and for Flight Test applications. H.264/AVC is the most modern and bandwidth-efficient compression algor...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Paper |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58305 |
| _version_ | 1848760226353774592 |
|---|---|
| author | Hallamasek, K. Hallamasek, K. Schwagler, B. Oxley, Leslie |
| author_facet | Hallamasek, K. Hallamasek, K. Schwagler, B. Oxley, Leslie |
| author_sort | Hallamasek, K. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The H.264/AVC standard, popular in commercial video recording and distribution, has also been widely adopted for high-definition video compression in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance and for Flight Test applications. H.264/AVC is the most modern and bandwidth-efficient compression algorithm specified for video recording in the Digital Recording IRIG Standard 106-11, Chapter 10. This bandwidth efficiency is largely derived from the inter-frame compression component of the standard. Motion JPEG-2000 compression is often considered for cockpit display recording, due to the concern that details in the symbols and graphics suffer excessively from artifacts of inter-frame compression and that critical information might be lost. In this paper, we report on a quantitative comparison of H.264/AVC and Motion JPEG-2000 encoding for HD video telemetry. Actual encoder implementations in video recorder products are used for the comparison. © International Foundation For Telemetering, 2012. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:12:25Z |
| format | Conference Paper |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-58305 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:12:25Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-583052017-11-24T05:24:57Z Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry Hallamasek, K. Hallamasek, K. Schwagler, B. Oxley, Leslie The H.264/AVC standard, popular in commercial video recording and distribution, has also been widely adopted for high-definition video compression in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance and for Flight Test applications. H.264/AVC is the most modern and bandwidth-efficient compression algorithm specified for video recording in the Digital Recording IRIG Standard 106-11, Chapter 10. This bandwidth efficiency is largely derived from the inter-frame compression component of the standard. Motion JPEG-2000 compression is often considered for cockpit display recording, due to the concern that details in the symbols and graphics suffer excessively from artifacts of inter-frame compression and that critical information might be lost. In this paper, we report on a quantitative comparison of H.264/AVC and Motion JPEG-2000 encoding for HD video telemetry. Actual encoder implementations in video recorder products are used for the comparison. © International Foundation For Telemetering, 2012. 2012 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58305 restricted |
| spellingShingle | Hallamasek, K. Hallamasek, K. Schwagler, B. Oxley, Leslie Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title | Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58305 |