Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Objectives To ascertain the association between caesarean delivery and breastfeeding practices in China. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Du, M., Binns, Colin, Lee, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer New York LLC 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/57872
_version_ 1848760120064868352
author Zhao, J.
Zhao, Y.
Du, M.
Binns, Colin
Lee, A.
author_facet Zhao, J.
Zhao, Y.
Du, M.
Binns, Colin
Lee, A.
author_sort Zhao, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Objectives To ascertain the association between caesarean delivery and breastfeeding practices in China. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Electronic databases of CNKI, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest and Science Direct were searched and screened to identify relevant articles from January 1990 to June 2015. Both fixed and random effect meta-analysis techniques were used to estimate the pooled effect size between caesarean delivery and breastfeeding outcomes at different time points. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Results Forty six studies were eligible for the qualitative synthesis of systematic review; among them, 27 studies were included for the meta-analysis. At the early postpartum period, the odds of exclusive breastfeeding after caesarean section was 47% (pooled OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41, 0.68) lower than that after vaginal delivery. At 4 months postpartum, the odds of breastfeeding was similarly lower (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53, 0.71) for caesarean mothers. Substantial heterogeneity among studies was detected for both breastfeeding outcomes. Subgroup analyses stratified by study design, time points of breastfeeding outcomes and definitions of breastfeeding all confirmed the negative association between caesarean section and breastfeeding prevalence. Conclusions In China, breastfeeding practices were affected adversely by caesarean delivery. Therefore, health policy to improve breastfeeding outcomes should take this into consideration.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:10:43Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-57872
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:10:43Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer New York LLC
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-578722017-11-20T08:58:16Z Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhao, J. Zhao, Y. Du, M. Binns, Colin Lee, A. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Objectives To ascertain the association between caesarean delivery and breastfeeding practices in China. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Electronic databases of CNKI, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest and Science Direct were searched and screened to identify relevant articles from January 1990 to June 2015. Both fixed and random effect meta-analysis techniques were used to estimate the pooled effect size between caesarean delivery and breastfeeding outcomes at different time points. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Results Forty six studies were eligible for the qualitative synthesis of systematic review; among them, 27 studies were included for the meta-analysis. At the early postpartum period, the odds of exclusive breastfeeding after caesarean section was 47% (pooled OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41, 0.68) lower than that after vaginal delivery. At 4 months postpartum, the odds of breastfeeding was similarly lower (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53, 0.71) for caesarean mothers. Substantial heterogeneity among studies was detected for both breastfeeding outcomes. Subgroup analyses stratified by study design, time points of breastfeeding outcomes and definitions of breastfeeding all confirmed the negative association between caesarean section and breastfeeding prevalence. Conclusions In China, breastfeeding practices were affected adversely by caesarean delivery. Therefore, health policy to improve breastfeeding outcomes should take this into consideration. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/57872 10.1007/s10995-017-2369-x Springer New York LLC restricted
spellingShingle Zhao, J.
Zhao, Y.
Du, M.
Binns, Colin
Lee, A.
Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Does Caesarean Section Affect Breastfeeding Practices in China? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort does caesarean section affect breastfeeding practices in china? a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/57872