Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications
This article considers the scope for utilising suppression orders to prevent the risk of prejudice to the administration of justice, in light of the wide availability of internet communications. Drawing from principles articulated in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal case, Fairfax v Ibrahim, this art...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | https://ssrn.com/abstract=2485978 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56851 |
| _version_ | 1848759952723673088 |
|---|---|
| author | Fitzgerald, B. Foong, Cheryl |
| author_facet | Fitzgerald, B. Foong, Cheryl |
| author_sort | Fitzgerald, B. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This article considers the scope for utilising suppression orders to prevent the risk of prejudice to the administration of justice, in light of the wide availability of internet communications. Drawing from principles articulated in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal case, Fairfax v Ibrahim, this article will explain the form in which such orders may take, and the significance of the ‘notice and takedown’ procedure adopted by the court. The article will further outline the considerations (of specific interest to search engines and social media platforms) that a court will take into account in deciding whether a suppression order is necessary in the circumstances. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:08:04Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-56851 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T10:08:04Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-568512024-06-06T01:48:21Z Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications Fitzgerald, B. Foong, Cheryl This article considers the scope for utilising suppression orders to prevent the risk of prejudice to the administration of justice, in light of the wide availability of internet communications. Drawing from principles articulated in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal case, Fairfax v Ibrahim, this article will explain the form in which such orders may take, and the significance of the ‘notice and takedown’ procedure adopted by the court. The article will further outline the considerations (of specific interest to search engines and social media platforms) that a court will take into account in deciding whether a suppression order is necessary in the circumstances. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56851 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2485978 fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Fitzgerald, B. Foong, Cheryl Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title | Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title_full | Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title_fullStr | Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title_full_unstemmed | Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title_short | Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications |
| title_sort | suppression orders after fairfax v ibrahim: implications for internet communications |
| url | https://ssrn.com/abstract=2485978 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56851 |