Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates

The goal of this work is to analyse the hydrate equilibria of methane + propane, i-butane and n-butane gas mixtures. Experimental hydrate equilibrium data was acquired for various compositions of these components in methane, ranging from 0.5 to 6.8 mol%. Applying this information with the Clausius-C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith, C., Pack, D., Barifcani, Ahmed
Format: Journal Article
Published: Academic Press 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56661
_version_ 1848759907220717568
author Smith, C.
Pack, D.
Barifcani, Ahmed
author_facet Smith, C.
Pack, D.
Barifcani, Ahmed
author_sort Smith, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The goal of this work is to analyse the hydrate equilibria of methane + propane, i-butane and n-butane gas mixtures. Experimental hydrate equilibrium data was acquired for various compositions of these components in methane, ranging from 0.5 to 6.8 mol%. Applying this information with the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, the extent of hydrate promotion was demonstrated quantitatively by calculating the slope of the equation and the dissociation enthalpy (?H d ). Methane equilibria was found to be most sensitive towards propane and i-butane, where very small concentrations were sufficient to increase the thermodynamic conditions for hydrate equilibrium drastically. The degree of hydrate stabilisation, i.e. transition from sI to sII hydrate, was immediate – there was no detectable composition slightly above 0.0 mol% where propane or i-butane did not have a sII hydrate-promoting impact, although one was implied with the aid of Calsep PVTsim calculations. Addition of n-butane to methane was far less sensitive and was deemed inert from 0.0 to 0.5 mol%. It was concluded that the sII hydrate was favoured when the n-butane composition exceeded 0.5–0.75 mol%. The influence of composition on stability was quantified by determining the gradient of ?H d versus mol% plots for the initial steep region that represents the increasing occupancy of the sII guests. Average gradients of 11.66, 26.64 and 43.50 kJ/mol.mol% were determined for n-butane, propane and i-butane addition to methane respectively. A hydrate-inert range for propane/i-butane (in methane) was suspected according to the perceived inflection point when less 0.5 mol%, implying the gradient was very low at some minute concentration range starting at 0.0 mol%. Awareness of these sI to sII transition regions is beneficial to natural gas recovery and processing as a small percentage of these components may remain without being detrimental in terms of promoting the hydrate equilibria.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:07:20Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-56661
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:07:20Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Academic Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-566612019-09-02T05:48:40Z Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates Smith, C. Pack, D. Barifcani, Ahmed The goal of this work is to analyse the hydrate equilibria of methane + propane, i-butane and n-butane gas mixtures. Experimental hydrate equilibrium data was acquired for various compositions of these components in methane, ranging from 0.5 to 6.8 mol%. Applying this information with the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, the extent of hydrate promotion was demonstrated quantitatively by calculating the slope of the equation and the dissociation enthalpy (?H d ). Methane equilibria was found to be most sensitive towards propane and i-butane, where very small concentrations were sufficient to increase the thermodynamic conditions for hydrate equilibrium drastically. The degree of hydrate stabilisation, i.e. transition from sI to sII hydrate, was immediate – there was no detectable composition slightly above 0.0 mol% where propane or i-butane did not have a sII hydrate-promoting impact, although one was implied with the aid of Calsep PVTsim calculations. Addition of n-butane to methane was far less sensitive and was deemed inert from 0.0 to 0.5 mol%. It was concluded that the sII hydrate was favoured when the n-butane composition exceeded 0.5–0.75 mol%. The influence of composition on stability was quantified by determining the gradient of ?H d versus mol% plots for the initial steep region that represents the increasing occupancy of the sII guests. Average gradients of 11.66, 26.64 and 43.50 kJ/mol.mol% were determined for n-butane, propane and i-butane addition to methane respectively. A hydrate-inert range for propane/i-butane (in methane) was suspected according to the perceived inflection point when less 0.5 mol%, implying the gradient was very low at some minute concentration range starting at 0.0 mol%. Awareness of these sI to sII transition regions is beneficial to natural gas recovery and processing as a small percentage of these components may remain without being detrimental in terms of promoting the hydrate equilibria. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56661 10.1016/j.jct.2017.08.013 Academic Press fulltext
spellingShingle Smith, C.
Pack, D.
Barifcani, Ahmed
Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title_full Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title_fullStr Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title_full_unstemmed Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title_short Propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
title_sort propane, n-butane and i-butane stabilization effects on methane gas hydrates
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56661