Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Halkett, Georgia, Berg, Melissa, Ebert, M., Cutt, D., Davis, M., Hegney, D., House, M., Judson, M., Kearvell, R., Krawiec, M., Lester, L., Maresse, Sharon, McLoone, P., McKay, Jan
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56336
_version_ 1848759848996438016
author Halkett, Georgia
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, M.
Cutt, D.
Davis, M.
Hegney, D.
House, M.
Judson, M.
Kearvell, R.
Krawiec, M.
Lester, L.
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, P.
McKay, Jan
author_facet Halkett, Georgia
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, M.
Cutt, D.
Davis, M.
Hegney, D.
House, M.
Judson, M.
Kearvell, R.
Krawiec, M.
Lester, L.
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, P.
McKay, Jan
author_sort Halkett, Georgia
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six RTs answered the research questions. Forty-six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self-directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:06:25Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-56336
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:06:25Z
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-563362017-09-13T16:11:01Z Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research. Halkett, Georgia Berg, Melissa Ebert, M. Cutt, D. Davis, M. Hegney, D. House, M. Judson, M. Kearvell, R. Krawiec, M. Lester, L. Maresse, Sharon McLoone, P. McKay, Jan INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six RTs answered the research questions. Forty-six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self-directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56336 10.1002/jmrs.237 John Wiley & Sons unknown
spellingShingle Halkett, Georgia
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, M.
Cutt, D.
Davis, M.
Hegney, D.
House, M.
Judson, M.
Kearvell, R.
Krawiec, M.
Lester, L.
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, P.
McKay, Jan
Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title_full Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title_fullStr Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title_short Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
title_sort radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56336