The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach

Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate Botulinum Toxin Type A efficacy on spasticity and pain in the upper/lower limb in adults. Data Sources: Pubmed, Cinahl, Amed, Embase and Cochrane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baker, J., Pereira, Gavin
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications Ltd 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55487
_version_ 1848759634287919104
author Baker, J.
Pereira, Gavin
author_facet Baker, J.
Pereira, Gavin
author_sort Baker, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate Botulinum Toxin Type A efficacy on spasticity and pain in the upper/lower limb in adults. Data Sources: Pubmed, Cinahl, Amed, Embase and Cochrane Databases. English language. 1989 to April 2013. Review methods: All randomized controlled trials on adults with spasticity of any origin in the upper or lower limb, treated with a single dose of Botulinum Toxin A, with outcome measures for pain or spasticity. Quality was assessed by GRADE, which uses a transparent, structured process for developing and presenting summaries of evidence, including its quality, for systematic reviews. Results:A total of 37 studies were reviewed. A meta-analysis was carried out on 10 for pain and 21 for spasticity. Evidence quality was low/very low for pain. No significant effect was found in the upper limb (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.44, confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.90, Z = 1.88, P=0.06), and no effect was found in the lower limb (risk ratio (RR) = 1.01 CI 0.19 to 5.36, Z = 0.02, P=0.99). Evidence quality for spasticity was moderate. Significant effects were found for Botulinum Toxin in the upper limb (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.88, CI 0.63 to 1.14, Z = 6.86, P < 0.00001), and the lower limb (RR=2.42, CI 1.60 to 3.65, Z=4.18, P < 0.0001). Conclusion:The use of Botulinum Toxin A is supported for upper and lower limb spasticity. Further evidence is needed for spasticity-related pain. Evidence quality is reduced by inadequate study design. © 2013 The Author(s).
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:03:00Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-55487
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:03:00Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Sage Publications Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-554872017-09-13T16:09:55Z The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach Baker, J. Pereira, Gavin Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate Botulinum Toxin Type A efficacy on spasticity and pain in the upper/lower limb in adults. Data Sources: Pubmed, Cinahl, Amed, Embase and Cochrane Databases. English language. 1989 to April 2013. Review methods: All randomized controlled trials on adults with spasticity of any origin in the upper or lower limb, treated with a single dose of Botulinum Toxin A, with outcome measures for pain or spasticity. Quality was assessed by GRADE, which uses a transparent, structured process for developing and presenting summaries of evidence, including its quality, for systematic reviews. Results:A total of 37 studies were reviewed. A meta-analysis was carried out on 10 for pain and 21 for spasticity. Evidence quality was low/very low for pain. No significant effect was found in the upper limb (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.44, confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.90, Z = 1.88, P=0.06), and no effect was found in the lower limb (risk ratio (RR) = 1.01 CI 0.19 to 5.36, Z = 0.02, P=0.99). Evidence quality for spasticity was moderate. Significant effects were found for Botulinum Toxin in the upper limb (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.88, CI 0.63 to 1.14, Z = 6.86, P < 0.00001), and the lower limb (RR=2.42, CI 1.60 to 3.65, Z=4.18, P < 0.0001). Conclusion:The use of Botulinum Toxin A is supported for upper and lower limb spasticity. Further evidence is needed for spasticity-related pain. Evidence quality is reduced by inadequate study design. © 2013 The Author(s). 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55487 10.1177/0269215513491274 Sage Publications Ltd restricted
spellingShingle Baker, J.
Pereira, Gavin
The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title_full The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title_fullStr The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title_short The efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for spasticity and pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach
title_sort efficacy of botulinum toxin a for spasticity and pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the grades of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation approach
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55487