Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen

Although zircon is the most widely used geochronometer to determine the crystallisation ages of granites, it can be unreliable for low-temperature melts because they may not crystallise new zircon. For leucocratic granites U–Pb zircon dates, therefore, may reflect the ages of the source rocks rather...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piechocka, A., Gregory, C., Zi, J., Sheppard, S., Wingate, M., Rasmussen, Birger
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer 2017
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP130100922
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54843
_version_ 1848759476344061952
author Piechocka, A.
Gregory, C.
Zi, J.
Sheppard, S.
Wingate, M.
Rasmussen, Birger
author_facet Piechocka, A.
Gregory, C.
Zi, J.
Sheppard, S.
Wingate, M.
Rasmussen, Birger
author_sort Piechocka, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Although zircon is the most widely used geochronometer to determine the crystallisation ages of granites, it can be unreliable for low-temperature melts because they may not crystallise new zircon. For leucocratic granites U–Pb zircon dates, therefore, may reflect the ages of the source rocks rather than the igneous crystallisation age. In the Proterozoic Capricorn Orogen of Western Australia, leucocratic granites are associated with several pulses of intracontinental magmatism spanning ~800 million years. In several instances, SHRIMP U–Pb zircon dating of these leucocratic granites either yielded ages that were inconclusive (e.g., multiple concordant ages) or incompatible with other geochronological data. To overcome this we used SHRIMP U–Th–Pb monazite geochronology to obtain igneous crystallisation ages that are consistent with the geological and geochronological framework of the orogen. The U–Th–Pb monazite geochronology has resolved the time interval over which two granitic supersuites were emplaced; a Paleoproterozoic supersuite thought to span ~80 million years was emplaced in less than half that time (1688–1659 Ma) and a small Meso- to Neoproterozoic supersuite considered to have been intruded over ~70 million years was instead assembled over ~130 million years and outlasted associated regional metamorphism by ~100 million years. Both findings have consequences for the duration of associated orogenic events and any estimates for magma generation rates. The monazite geochronology has contributed to a more reliable tectonic history for a complex, long-lived orogen. Our results emphasise the benefit of monazite as a geochronometer for leucocratic granites derived by low-temperature crustal melting and are relevant to other orogens worldwide.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:00:29Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-54843
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:00:29Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-548432022-11-23T03:23:16Z Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen Piechocka, A. Gregory, C. Zi, J. Sheppard, S. Wingate, M. Rasmussen, Birger Although zircon is the most widely used geochronometer to determine the crystallisation ages of granites, it can be unreliable for low-temperature melts because they may not crystallise new zircon. For leucocratic granites U–Pb zircon dates, therefore, may reflect the ages of the source rocks rather than the igneous crystallisation age. In the Proterozoic Capricorn Orogen of Western Australia, leucocratic granites are associated with several pulses of intracontinental magmatism spanning ~800 million years. In several instances, SHRIMP U–Pb zircon dating of these leucocratic granites either yielded ages that were inconclusive (e.g., multiple concordant ages) or incompatible with other geochronological data. To overcome this we used SHRIMP U–Th–Pb monazite geochronology to obtain igneous crystallisation ages that are consistent with the geological and geochronological framework of the orogen. The U–Th–Pb monazite geochronology has resolved the time interval over which two granitic supersuites were emplaced; a Paleoproterozoic supersuite thought to span ~80 million years was emplaced in less than half that time (1688–1659 Ma) and a small Meso- to Neoproterozoic supersuite considered to have been intruded over ~70 million years was instead assembled over ~130 million years and outlasted associated regional metamorphism by ~100 million years. Both findings have consequences for the duration of associated orogenic events and any estimates for magma generation rates. The monazite geochronology has contributed to a more reliable tectonic history for a complex, long-lived orogen. Our results emphasise the benefit of monazite as a geochronometer for leucocratic granites derived by low-temperature crustal melting and are relevant to other orogens worldwide. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54843 10.1007/s00410-017-1386-5 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP130100922 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Springer fulltext
spellingShingle Piechocka, A.
Gregory, C.
Zi, J.
Sheppard, S.
Wingate, M.
Rasmussen, Birger
Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title_full Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title_fullStr Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title_full_unstemmed Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title_short Monazite trumps zircon: applying SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex Precambrian orogen
title_sort monazite trumps zircon: applying shrimp u–pb geochronology to systematically evaluate emplacement ages of leucocratic, low-temperature granites in a complex precambrian orogen
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP130100922
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54843