Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests

The aim of our study was to determine the contribution of secular trends and sample size to lung function reference equations, and establish the number of local subjects required to validate published reference values. 30 spirometry datasets collected between 1978 and 2009 provided data on healthy,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quanjer, P., Stocks, J., Cole, T., Hall, Graham, Stanojevic, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: European Respiratory Society 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54264
_version_ 1848759327719948288
author Quanjer, P.
Stocks, J.
Cole, T.
Hall, Graham
Stanojevic, S.
author_facet Quanjer, P.
Stocks, J.
Cole, T.
Hall, Graham
Stanojevic, S.
author_sort Quanjer, P.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The aim of our study was to determine the contribution of secular trends and sample size to lung function reference equations, and establish the number of local subjects required to validate published reference values. 30 spirometry datasets collected between 1978 and 2009 provided data on healthy, white subjects: 19,291 males and 23,741 females aged 2.5–95 yrs. The best fit for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC as functions of age, height and sex were derived from the entire dataset using GAMLSS. Mean z-scores were calculated for individual datasets to determine inter-centre differences. This was repeated by subdividing one large dataset (3,683 males and 4,759 females) into 36 smaller subsets (comprising 18–227 individuals) to preclude differences due to population/technique. No secular trends were observed and differences between datasets comprising >1,000 subjects were small (maximum difference in FEV1 and FVC from overall mean: 0.30– -0.22 z-scores). Subdividing one large dataset into smaller subsets reproduced the above sample size-related differences and revealed that at least 150 males and 150 females would be necessary to validate reference values to avoid spurious differences due to sampling error. Use of local controls to validate reference equations will rarely be practical due to the numbers required. Reference equations derived from large or collated datasets are recommended.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:58:08Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-54264
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:58:08Z
publishDate 2011
publisher European Respiratory Society
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-542642017-09-29T03:57:10Z Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests Quanjer, P. Stocks, J. Cole, T. Hall, Graham Stanojevic, S. The aim of our study was to determine the contribution of secular trends and sample size to lung function reference equations, and establish the number of local subjects required to validate published reference values. 30 spirometry datasets collected between 1978 and 2009 provided data on healthy, white subjects: 19,291 males and 23,741 females aged 2.5–95 yrs. The best fit for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC as functions of age, height and sex were derived from the entire dataset using GAMLSS. Mean z-scores were calculated for individual datasets to determine inter-centre differences. This was repeated by subdividing one large dataset (3,683 males and 4,759 females) into 36 smaller subsets (comprising 18–227 individuals) to preclude differences due to population/technique. No secular trends were observed and differences between datasets comprising >1,000 subjects were small (maximum difference in FEV1 and FVC from overall mean: 0.30– -0.22 z-scores). Subdividing one large dataset into smaller subsets reproduced the above sample size-related differences and revealed that at least 150 males and 150 females would be necessary to validate reference values to avoid spurious differences due to sampling error. Use of local controls to validate reference equations will rarely be practical due to the numbers required. Reference equations derived from large or collated datasets are recommended. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54264 10.1183/09031936.00110010 European Respiratory Society unknown
spellingShingle Quanjer, P.
Stocks, J.
Cole, T.
Hall, Graham
Stanojevic, S.
Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title_full Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title_fullStr Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title_full_unstemmed Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title_short Influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
title_sort influence of secular trends and sample size on reference equations for lung function tests
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54264