End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests

A refined software algorithm was recently proposed for the analysis of infant multiple breath washout (MBW) measurements. The proposed algorithm uses the change in end-inspiratory molar mass between the wash-in and wash-out curves (EIMM-step) to define the required step response correction of the MM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foong, R., Rosenow, T., Simpson, S., Stöklin, B., Gray, D., Pillow, J., Hall, Graham, Ramsey, K.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Liss, Inc 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54226
_version_ 1848759318861578240
author Foong, R.
Rosenow, T.
Simpson, S.
Stöklin, B.
Gray, D.
Pillow, J.
Hall, Graham
Ramsey, K.
author_facet Foong, R.
Rosenow, T.
Simpson, S.
Stöklin, B.
Gray, D.
Pillow, J.
Hall, Graham
Ramsey, K.
author_sort Foong, R.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A refined software algorithm was recently proposed for the analysis of infant multiple breath washout (MBW) measurements. The proposed algorithm uses the change in end-inspiratory molar mass between the wash-in and wash-out curves (EIMM-step) to define the required step response correction of the MM signal and is assumed to provide an accurate evaluation of complete washout of the tracer gas, in comparison to the current software algorithm which applies the change in end-expiratory molar mass (EEMM)-step. We aimed to evaluate the use of the EIM M-step method in a broad range of infants. We performed retrospective analyses comparing the EIMM- and EEMM-step change methods in MBW data collected from infants with cystic fibrosis (CF), infants born preterm, and healthy infants using an ultrasonic flowmeter. We found that the EIMM-step correction significantly increased LCI and functional residual capacity (FRC) in infants with CF, preterm infants, and healthy infants compared with the EEMM-step method. In addition, more than half the measurements that were technically acceptable and repeatable using the EEMM-step correction in healthy infants were excluded after using the EIMM-step correction. We found a large difference between the EIMM- and EEMM-steps in healthy infants indicating incomplete washout, suggesting the need for a longer washout time with using the EIMM-step analysis method. The data indicates that the EIMM-step analysis method may have the potential to generate false abnormal LCI values in individuals without lung disease. Revised normative data may be required if this method is universally adopted.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:57:59Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-54226
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:57:59Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley-Liss, Inc
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-542262017-09-29T07:05:36Z End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests Foong, R. Rosenow, T. Simpson, S. Stöklin, B. Gray, D. Pillow, J. Hall, Graham Ramsey, K. A refined software algorithm was recently proposed for the analysis of infant multiple breath washout (MBW) measurements. The proposed algorithm uses the change in end-inspiratory molar mass between the wash-in and wash-out curves (EIMM-step) to define the required step response correction of the MM signal and is assumed to provide an accurate evaluation of complete washout of the tracer gas, in comparison to the current software algorithm which applies the change in end-expiratory molar mass (EEMM)-step. We aimed to evaluate the use of the EIM M-step method in a broad range of infants. We performed retrospective analyses comparing the EIMM- and EEMM-step change methods in MBW data collected from infants with cystic fibrosis (CF), infants born preterm, and healthy infants using an ultrasonic flowmeter. We found that the EIMM-step correction significantly increased LCI and functional residual capacity (FRC) in infants with CF, preterm infants, and healthy infants compared with the EEMM-step method. In addition, more than half the measurements that were technically acceptable and repeatable using the EEMM-step correction in healthy infants were excluded after using the EIMM-step correction. We found a large difference between the EIMM- and EEMM-steps in healthy infants indicating incomplete washout, suggesting the need for a longer washout time with using the EIMM-step analysis method. The data indicates that the EIMM-step analysis method may have the potential to generate false abnormal LCI values in individuals without lung disease. Revised normative data may be required if this method is universally adopted. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54226 10.1002/ppul.23499 Wiley-Liss, Inc unknown
spellingShingle Foong, R.
Rosenow, T.
Simpson, S.
Stöklin, B.
Gray, D.
Pillow, J.
Hall, Graham
Ramsey, K.
End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title_full End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title_fullStr End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title_full_unstemmed End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title_short End-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
title_sort end-inspiratory molar mass step correction for analysis of infant multiple breath washout tests
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54226