What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective

The purpose of this paper is to take a critical look at the question "what is a competent project manager?" and bring some fresh added-value insights. This leads us to analyze the definitions, and assessment approaches of project manager competence. Three major standards as prescribed by P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bredillet, C., Tywoniak, Stephane, Dwivedula, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Pergamon 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54000
_version_ 1848759279702507520
author Bredillet, C.
Tywoniak, Stephane
Dwivedula, R.
author_facet Bredillet, C.
Tywoniak, Stephane
Dwivedula, R.
author_sort Bredillet, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The purpose of this paper is to take a critical look at the question "what is a competent project manager?" and bring some fresh added-value insights. This leads us to analyze the definitions, and assessment approaches of project manager competence. Three major standards as prescribed by PMI, IPMA, and GAPPS are considered for review from an attribute-based and performance-based approach and from a deontological and consequentialist ethics perspectives. Two fundamental tensions are identified: an ethical tension between the standards and the related competence assessment frameworks and a tension between attribute and performance-based approaches. Aristotelian ethical and practical philosophy is brought in to reconcile these differences. Considering ethics of character that rises beyond the normative deontological and consequentialist perspectives is suggested. Taking the mediating role of praxis and phrónêsis between theory and practice into consideration is advocated to resolve the tension between performance and attribute-based approaches to competence assessment.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:57:22Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-54000
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:57:22Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Pergamon
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-540002017-09-21T01:29:43Z What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective Bredillet, C. Tywoniak, Stephane Dwivedula, R. The purpose of this paper is to take a critical look at the question "what is a competent project manager?" and bring some fresh added-value insights. This leads us to analyze the definitions, and assessment approaches of project manager competence. Three major standards as prescribed by PMI, IPMA, and GAPPS are considered for review from an attribute-based and performance-based approach and from a deontological and consequentialist ethics perspectives. Two fundamental tensions are identified: an ethical tension between the standards and the related competence assessment frameworks and a tension between attribute and performance-based approaches. Aristotelian ethical and practical philosophy is brought in to reconcile these differences. Considering ethics of character that rises beyond the normative deontological and consequentialist perspectives is suggested. Taking the mediating role of praxis and phrónêsis between theory and practice into consideration is advocated to resolve the tension between performance and attribute-based approaches to competence assessment. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54000 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.001 Pergamon restricted
spellingShingle Bredillet, C.
Tywoniak, Stephane
Dwivedula, R.
What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title_full What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title_fullStr What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title_full_unstemmed What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title_short What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective
title_sort what is a good project manager? an aristotelian perspective
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54000