Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa

After decades of debates on the viability of class actions in South Africa the supreme court of appeal has finally given recognition to a general class action for damages. There is clear authority, preceding the judgment under discussion, that section 38(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of Sou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Vos, Wouter
Format: Journal Article
Published: Juta & Company Ltd. * Juta Law 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53709
Description
Summary:After decades of debates on the viability of class actions in South Africa the supreme court of appeal has finally given recognition to a general class action for damages. There is clear authority, preceding the judgment under discussion, that section 38(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides a sufficient basis for the institution of a class action to enforce any constitutional right. The lack of legislation regulating these complicated proceedings has, therefore, not been viewed as an impediment to the prosecution of a large number of such similar claims in this manner. This has happened in the respective judgments of Froneman J, in Ngxuza v Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape (2001 2 SA 609 (E)) and Cameron JA, in Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape v Ngxuza (2001 4 SA 1184 (SCA)).