An institution-based view of global IPR history

Leveraging the use of history to advance international business research, this article focuses on the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Ironically, during the 19th century the United States was not a leading IPR advocate as it is today, but w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng, Mike, Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S., Shi, W.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Palgrave Macmillan 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53505
_version_ 1848759160667111424
author Peng, Mike
Ahlstrom, D.
Carraher, S.
Shi, W.
author_facet Peng, Mike
Ahlstrom, D.
Carraher, S.
Shi, W.
author_sort Peng, Mike
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Leveraging the use of history to advance international business research, this article focuses on the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Ironically, during the 19th century the United States was not a leading IPR advocate as it is today, but was a leading IPR violator. Developing an institution-based view of IPR history, we identify three underlying theoretical mechanisms that help to explain IPR in the two countries – path dependence, long-term processes, and institutional transitions. We argue that both the US refusal to protect foreign IPR in the 19th century and the current Chinese lack of enthusiasm to meet US IPR demands embody rational responses to their respective situations. However, given long-term processes with intensifying isomorphic pressures, institutional transitions in favor of better IPR protection are quite possible. Finally, going above and beyond these two countries, we draw on the IPR history in over ten other countries to develop a more globally generalizable framework, which in turn contributes to the key question of how history matters.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:55:28Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-53505
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:55:28Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Palgrave Macmillan
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-535052017-10-10T06:34:18Z An institution-based view of global IPR history Peng, Mike Ahlstrom, D. Carraher, S. Shi, W. Leveraging the use of history to advance international business research, this article focuses on the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Ironically, during the 19th century the United States was not a leading IPR advocate as it is today, but was a leading IPR violator. Developing an institution-based view of IPR history, we identify three underlying theoretical mechanisms that help to explain IPR in the two countries – path dependence, long-term processes, and institutional transitions. We argue that both the US refusal to protect foreign IPR in the 19th century and the current Chinese lack of enthusiasm to meet US IPR demands embody rational responses to their respective situations. However, given long-term processes with intensifying isomorphic pressures, institutional transitions in favor of better IPR protection are quite possible. Finally, going above and beyond these two countries, we draw on the IPR history in over ten other countries to develop a more globally generalizable framework, which in turn contributes to the key question of how history matters. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53505 10.1057/s41267-016-0061-9 Palgrave Macmillan restricted
spellingShingle Peng, Mike
Ahlstrom, D.
Carraher, S.
Shi, W.
An institution-based view of global IPR history
title An institution-based view of global IPR history
title_full An institution-based view of global IPR history
title_fullStr An institution-based view of global IPR history
title_full_unstemmed An institution-based view of global IPR history
title_short An institution-based view of global IPR history
title_sort institution-based view of global ipr history
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53505