Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation

Background: Recent investigations have suggested that disrupted body-image may contribute to the lumbopelvic pain experience. The changes in body shape and size associated with pregnancy suggest that pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain might be a problem in which alterations in body-image are particu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wand, B., Elliott, R., Sawyer, A., Spence, R., Beales, Darren, O'Sullivan, Peter, Smith, Anne, Gibson, W.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53293
_version_ 1848759109502894080
author Wand, B.
Elliott, R.
Sawyer, A.
Spence, R.
Beales, Darren
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Gibson, W.
author_facet Wand, B.
Elliott, R.
Sawyer, A.
Spence, R.
Beales, Darren
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Gibson, W.
author_sort Wand, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Recent investigations have suggested that disrupted body-image may contribute to the lumbopelvic pain experience. The changes in body shape and size associated with pregnancy suggest that pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain might be a problem in which alterations in body-image are particularly relevant. Objectives: To investigate if self-reported body-image is related to lumbopelvic pain status in women during pregnancy and explore the factors that might contribute to changes in body-image in women experiencing pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Method: Forty-two women in the third trimester of pregnancy were recruited regardless of clinical status. Pain intensity and disability were measured to estimate clinical severity. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire was used to assess body-image. Participants also completed a series of questionnaires and physical tests to explore factors that might be associated with altered body-image. Results: The median Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire score for the pain free women was 1 (IQR 0–1.5) and the median score for those in pain was 3.5 (IQR 2–8). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.005). The questionnaire score was significantly correlated with pain intensity but not with disability. Of the measured variables only pain catastrophisation was significantly associated with disrupted body-image. Conclusions: Self-reported disruption of body-image was significantly greater in pregnant women who were experiencing lumbopelvic pain than those who weren't and the extent of body-image disruption was associated with pain intensity. Only pain related catastrophisation was related to disrupted body-image.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:54:39Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-53293
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:54:39Z
publishDate 2017
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-532932017-10-24T01:32:16Z Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation Wand, B. Elliott, R. Sawyer, A. Spence, R. Beales, Darren O'Sullivan, Peter Smith, Anne Gibson, W. Background: Recent investigations have suggested that disrupted body-image may contribute to the lumbopelvic pain experience. The changes in body shape and size associated with pregnancy suggest that pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain might be a problem in which alterations in body-image are particularly relevant. Objectives: To investigate if self-reported body-image is related to lumbopelvic pain status in women during pregnancy and explore the factors that might contribute to changes in body-image in women experiencing pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Method: Forty-two women in the third trimester of pregnancy were recruited regardless of clinical status. Pain intensity and disability were measured to estimate clinical severity. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire was used to assess body-image. Participants also completed a series of questionnaires and physical tests to explore factors that might be associated with altered body-image. Results: The median Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire score for the pain free women was 1 (IQR 0–1.5) and the median score for those in pain was 3.5 (IQR 2–8). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.005). The questionnaire score was significantly correlated with pain intensity but not with disability. Of the measured variables only pain catastrophisation was significantly associated with disrupted body-image. Conclusions: Self-reported disruption of body-image was significantly greater in pregnant women who were experiencing lumbopelvic pain than those who weren't and the extent of body-image disruption was associated with pain intensity. Only pain related catastrophisation was related to disrupted body-image. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53293 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.05.003 restricted
spellingShingle Wand, B.
Elliott, R.
Sawyer, A.
Spence, R.
Beales, Darren
O'Sullivan, Peter
Smith, Anne
Gibson, W.
Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title_full Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title_fullStr Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title_full_unstemmed Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title_short Disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. A preliminary investigation
title_sort disrupted body-image and pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. a preliminary investigation
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53293