Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA

In this paper three PID auto-tuning algorithms which are mainly focused on the disturbance rejection problem are compared. The algorithms differ in both the experiments carried out to obtain information of the process dynamic and the methods for calculating the controller parameters. The algorithms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romero-?erez, J., Arrieta, O., Padula, Fabrizio, Reynoso-Meza, G., Garcia-Nieto, S., Balaguer, P.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52804
_version_ 1848759015525318656
author Romero-?erez, J.
Arrieta, O.
Padula, Fabrizio
Reynoso-Meza, G.
Garcia-Nieto, S.
Balaguer, P.
author_facet Romero-?erez, J.
Arrieta, O.
Padula, Fabrizio
Reynoso-Meza, G.
Garcia-Nieto, S.
Balaguer, P.
author_sort Romero-?erez, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In this paper three PID auto-tuning algorithms which are mainly focused on the disturbance rejection problem are compared. The algorithms differ in both the experiments carried out to obtain information of the process dynamic and the methods for calculating the controller parameters. The algorithms were presented in the 2010-2011 Match of the Control Engineering Group of CEA. The comparison is based on an evaluation methodology that takes into account the experimental phase as well as the closed loop performance during the control phase. © 2011 CEA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:53:10Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-52804
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:53:10Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-528042017-09-13T15:40:42Z Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA Romero-?erez, J. Arrieta, O. Padula, Fabrizio Reynoso-Meza, G. Garcia-Nieto, S. Balaguer, P. In this paper three PID auto-tuning algorithms which are mainly focused on the disturbance rejection problem are compared. The algorithms differ in both the experiments carried out to obtain information of the process dynamic and the methods for calculating the controller parameters. The algorithms were presented in the 2010-2011 Match of the Control Engineering Group of CEA. The comparison is based on an evaluation methodology that takes into account the experimental phase as well as the closed loop performance during the control phase. © 2011 CEA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52804 10.1016/j.riai.2012.02.009 unknown
spellingShingle Romero-?erez, J.
Arrieta, O.
Padula, Fabrizio
Reynoso-Meza, G.
Garcia-Nieto, S.
Balaguer, P.
Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title_full Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title_fullStr Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title_short Comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for PID controllers. Results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of CEA
title_sort comparative study of auto-tuning algorithms for pid controllers. results of the 2010-2011 match of the control engineering group of cea
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52804