Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience

There has been little discussion or analysis regarding how integrity agencies work together. This paper looks at Western Australian watchdog collaboration activities in the context of concerns raised by senior judicial and political figures. Issues addressed include whether such collaborative activi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilkins, Peter, Phillimore, John, Gilchrist, David
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52776
_version_ 1848759008348864512
author Wilkins, Peter
Phillimore, John
Gilchrist, David
author_facet Wilkins, Peter
Phillimore, John
Gilchrist, David
author_sort Wilkins, Peter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description There has been little discussion or analysis regarding how integrity agencies work together. This paper looks at Western Australian watchdog collaboration activities in the context of concerns raised by senior judicial and political figures. Issues addressed include whether such collaborative activities impinge on the independence of watchdogs, impede their ability to oversight each other, and whether such activities take them beyond their legislative remit. Analysis of practice revealed a wide array of collaboration activities of varying intensity. It was found that such collaboration enhanced watchdog effectiveness while the concerns expressed appeared over-stated. The analysis identified precautions required to protect watchdog independence and ensure accountability for collaborative activities, including steps to recognize and remove barriers to greater collaboration.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:53:03Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-52776
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:53:03Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-527762017-10-11T03:46:43Z Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience Wilkins, Peter Phillimore, John Gilchrist, David There has been little discussion or analysis regarding how integrity agencies work together. This paper looks at Western Australian watchdog collaboration activities in the context of concerns raised by senior judicial and political figures. Issues addressed include whether such collaborative activities impinge on the independence of watchdogs, impede their ability to oversight each other, and whether such activities take them beyond their legislative remit. Analysis of practice revealed a wide array of collaboration activities of varying intensity. It was found that such collaboration enhanced watchdog effectiveness while the concerns expressed appeared over-stated. The analysis identified precautions required to protect watchdog independence and ensure accountability for collaborative activities, including steps to recognize and remove barriers to greater collaboration. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52776 10.1080/01442872.2017.1301414 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Wilkins, Peter
Phillimore, John
Gilchrist, David
Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title_full Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title_fullStr Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title_short Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
title_sort benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the western australian experience
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52776