Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?

Background: Danish patients with musculoskeletal disorders are commonly referred for primary care physiotherapy treatment but little is known about their general health status, pain diagnoses, clinical course and prognosis. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the clinical course of pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andersen, N., Kent, Peter, Hjort, J., Christiansen, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Biomed Central Ltd 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52497
_version_ 1848758940766044160
author Andersen, N.
Kent, Peter
Hjort, J.
Christiansen, D.
author_facet Andersen, N.
Kent, Peter
Hjort, J.
Christiansen, D.
author_sort Andersen, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Danish patients with musculoskeletal disorders are commonly referred for primary care physiotherapy treatment but little is known about their general health status, pain diagnoses, clinical course and prognosis. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the clinical course of patients with musculoskeletal disorders referred to physiotherapy, 2) identify predictors associated with a satisfactory outcome, and 3) determine the influence of the primary pain site diagnosis relative to those predictors. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients (n = 2,706) newly referred because of musculoskeletal pain to 30 physiotherapy practices from January 2012 to May 2012. Data were collected via a web-based questionnaire 1–2 days prior to the first physiotherapy consultation and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, from clinical records (including primary musculoskeletal symptom diagnosis based on the ICPC-2 classification system), and from national registry data. The main outcome was the Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Potential predictors were analysed using backwards step-wise selection during longitudinal Generalised Estimating Equation regression modelling. To assess the influence of pain site on these associations, primary pain site diagnosis was added to the model. Results: Of the patients included, 66% were female and the mean age was 48 (SD 15). The percentage of patients reporting their symptoms as acceptable was 32% at 6 weeks, 43% at 3 months and 52% at 6 months. A higher probability of satisfactory outcome was associated with place of residence, being retired, no compensation claim, less frequent pain, shorter duration of pain, lower levels of disability and fear avoidance, better mental health and being a non-smoker. Primary pain site diagnosis had little influence on these associations, and was not predictive of a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: Only half of the patients rated their symptoms as acceptable at 6 months. Although satisfactory outcome was difficult to predict at an individual patient level, there were a number of prognostic factors that were associated with this outcome. These factors should be considered when developing generic prediction tools to assess the probability of satisfactory outcome in musculoskeletal physiotherapy patients, because the site of pain did not affect that prognostic association.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:51:58Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-52497
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:51:58Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Biomed Central Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-524972017-09-21T06:14:26Z Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter? Andersen, N. Kent, Peter Hjort, J. Christiansen, D. Background: Danish patients with musculoskeletal disorders are commonly referred for primary care physiotherapy treatment but little is known about their general health status, pain diagnoses, clinical course and prognosis. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the clinical course of patients with musculoskeletal disorders referred to physiotherapy, 2) identify predictors associated with a satisfactory outcome, and 3) determine the influence of the primary pain site diagnosis relative to those predictors. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients (n = 2,706) newly referred because of musculoskeletal pain to 30 physiotherapy practices from January 2012 to May 2012. Data were collected via a web-based questionnaire 1–2 days prior to the first physiotherapy consultation and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, from clinical records (including primary musculoskeletal symptom diagnosis based on the ICPC-2 classification system), and from national registry data. The main outcome was the Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Potential predictors were analysed using backwards step-wise selection during longitudinal Generalised Estimating Equation regression modelling. To assess the influence of pain site on these associations, primary pain site diagnosis was added to the model. Results: Of the patients included, 66% were female and the mean age was 48 (SD 15). The percentage of patients reporting their symptoms as acceptable was 32% at 6 weeks, 43% at 3 months and 52% at 6 months. A higher probability of satisfactory outcome was associated with place of residence, being retired, no compensation claim, less frequent pain, shorter duration of pain, lower levels of disability and fear avoidance, better mental health and being a non-smoker. Primary pain site diagnosis had little influence on these associations, and was not predictive of a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: Only half of the patients rated their symptoms as acceptable at 6 months. Although satisfactory outcome was difficult to predict at an individual patient level, there were a number of prognostic factors that were associated with this outcome. These factors should be considered when developing generic prediction tools to assess the probability of satisfactory outcome in musculoskeletal physiotherapy patients, because the site of pain did not affect that prognostic association. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52497 10.1186/s12891-017-1487-3 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Biomed Central Ltd fulltext
spellingShingle Andersen, N.
Kent, Peter
Hjort, J.
Christiansen, D.
Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title_full Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title_fullStr Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title_short Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
title_sort clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52497