The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses

The competence and compellability of a witness should not be confused with the possible privileges which he might claim. Cowen & Carter 1 explain as follows: 'A competent witness is a person whom the law allows a party to ask. but not to compel, to evidence. A compellable witness is a perso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Vos, Wouter
Format: Book Chapter
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5235
_version_ 1848744739527983104
author De Vos, Wouter
author_facet De Vos, Wouter
author_sort De Vos, Wouter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The competence and compellability of a witness should not be confused with the possible privileges which he might claim. Cowen & Carter 1 explain as follows: 'A competent witness is a person whom the law allows a party to ask. but not to compel, to evidence. A compellable witness is a person whom the law allows a party to compel to evidence. There are certain questions which a witness may refuse to answer if he so wishes. He is said to be privilege in respect of those questions. It should be clear, therefore, that competence without compellability (or bare competence) is not the same as privilege. Compellability is concerned with whether a witness can be forced by a party to evidence al all. Privilege is concerned with whether a witness who is already in the box is obliged to answer a particular question. The protection of privilege is exactly the same whether the witness is barely competent and of his own free will elected to give evidence or the witness is compellable and was forced to give evidence." It follows that a competent and compellable witness who wishes to rely on, for example, the privilege against self-incrimination may not refuse to enter the witness-box: he may only claim his privilege once the relevant question is put to him.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:06:15Z
format Book Chapter
id curtin-20.500.11937-5235
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:06:15Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-52352019-09-10T06:25:33Z The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses De Vos, Wouter The competence and compellability of a witness should not be confused with the possible privileges which he might claim. Cowen & Carter 1 explain as follows: 'A competent witness is a person whom the law allows a party to ask. but not to compel, to evidence. A compellable witness is a person whom the law allows a party to compel to evidence. There are certain questions which a witness may refuse to answer if he so wishes. He is said to be privilege in respect of those questions. It should be clear, therefore, that competence without compellability (or bare competence) is not the same as privilege. Compellability is concerned with whether a witness can be forced by a party to evidence al all. Privilege is concerned with whether a witness who is already in the box is obliged to answer a particular question. The protection of privilege is exactly the same whether the witness is barely competent and of his own free will elected to give evidence or the witness is compellable and was forced to give evidence." It follows that a competent and compellable witness who wishes to rely on, for example, the privilege against self-incrimination may not refuse to enter the witness-box: he may only claim his privilege once the relevant question is put to him. 2016 Book Chapter http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5235 restricted
spellingShingle De Vos, Wouter
The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title_full The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title_fullStr The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title_full_unstemmed The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title_short The Competence and Compellability of Witnesses
title_sort competence and compellability of witnesses
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5235