The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts
Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destina...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51818 |
| _version_ | 1848758779185725440 |
|---|---|
| author | Volgger, Michael Pechlaner, H. Pichler, S. |
| author_facet | Volgger, Michael Pechlaner, H. Pichler, S. |
| author_sort | Volgger, Michael |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:49:24Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-51818 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:49:24Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-518182017-09-13T15:36:42Z The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts Volgger, Michael Pechlaner, H. Pichler, S. Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51818 10.5281/zenodo.401371 restricted |
| spellingShingle | Volgger, Michael Pechlaner, H. Pichler, S. The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title | The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title_full | The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title_fullStr | The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title_full_unstemmed | The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title_short | The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| title_sort | practice of destination governance: a comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51818 |