Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence

This study investigates the independent effects of environmental (E), social (S), corporate governance (G), and the composite ESG ratings on stock returns and corporate financing decisions of the largest stocks in the Australian equity market. Firms with high composite ESG ratings tend to increase t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Limkriangkrai, M., Koh, S., Durand, Robert
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51590
_version_ 1848758735218933760
author Limkriangkrai, M.
Koh, S.
Durand, Robert
author_facet Limkriangkrai, M.
Koh, S.
Durand, Robert
author_sort Limkriangkrai, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study investigates the independent effects of environmental (E), social (S), corporate governance (G), and the composite ESG ratings on stock returns and corporate financing decisions of the largest stocks in the Australian equity market. Firms with high composite ESG ratings tend to increase their leverage. For the individual ratings, we find different inferences: firms with low E and high G ratings tend to raise less debt. Firms with high G ratings hold less cash, while those with low G ratings have lower dividend payouts. S ratings have no impact on corporate financing decisions. There appears to be no significant difference in risk-adjusted returns for portfolios based on ESG ratings, effectively indicating that there is no cost of ESG investment.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:48:42Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-51590
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:48:42Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-515902017-10-26T03:41:33Z Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence Limkriangkrai, M. Koh, S. Durand, Robert This study investigates the independent effects of environmental (E), social (S), corporate governance (G), and the composite ESG ratings on stock returns and corporate financing decisions of the largest stocks in the Australian equity market. Firms with high composite ESG ratings tend to increase their leverage. For the individual ratings, we find different inferences: firms with low E and high G ratings tend to raise less debt. Firms with high G ratings hold less cash, while those with low G ratings have lower dividend payouts. S ratings have no impact on corporate financing decisions. There appears to be no significant difference in risk-adjusted returns for portfolios based on ESG ratings, effectively indicating that there is no cost of ESG investment. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51590 10.1111/irfi.12101 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia restricted
spellingShingle Limkriangkrai, M.
Koh, S.
Durand, Robert
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title_full Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title_fullStr Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title_short Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence
title_sort environmental, social, and governance (esg) profiles, stock returns, and financial policy: australian evidence
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51590